Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code - #9358

Merged
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Removed redundant greatest_common_divisor code#9358
cclauss merged 12 commits into
TheAlgorithms:masterfrom
Siddikpatel:sidbranch

Conversation

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe your change:

Previously all the files that needed greatest_common_divisor (aka gcd), used to define the method instead of just importing from Maths directory's greatest_common_divisor.py file. I removed thos definitions and imported gcd method from Maths folder. Fixes#8098

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 2, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says organize imports. Don't know what to do about that. Otherwise there are no issues

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Siddikpatel Please run ruff --fix . locally to have ruff auto-sort the imports

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 8, 2023
@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed the import issues!

Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
Comment threadmaths/greatest_common_divisor.py Outdated
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just remembered that the Python math module already has a gcd function. @cclauss, do you think it's better for our files to simply import gcd from math? Or is it better for our files to use our own implementation?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

BTW, @Siddikpatel, there are even more duplicate implementations of gcd if you search for "gcd" in the repo (for example, in maths/carmichael_number.py), so those could be removed as well

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Oct 8, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 8, 2023
@cclauss
cclauss enabled auto-merge (squash) October 8, 2023 05:09
@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and, what about those files that imports gcd from math module of python?

Those are fine—it's fine to import functions as helper functions as long as it doesn't include the core of the actual algorithm

@tianyizheng02tianyizheng02 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Comment threadmaths/carmichael_number.py Outdated
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot added merge conflicts Open a new PR or rebase on the latest commit awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 8, 2023
auto-merge was automatically disabled October 9, 2023 02:13

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks good, but the merge conflict will need to be fixed. I can't fix it myself because I don't have write permission, so could you fix it?

Ok I am confused now.. It says merge conflicts in modular_division.py.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK, I see what happened: a previous PR moved blockchain/modular__division.py to the maths directory, and that's causing a merge conflict here because you still have the file in the blockchain directory. I'm guessing that the conflict will be resolved if you move the file to the maths directory as well?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yup, it is fixed now.

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

@Siddikpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It says the file was deleted... did you not move it into the maths module?

I've moved it to maths directory.
Screenshot (160)

@cclauss
cclauss merged commit 583a614 into TheAlgorithms:masterOct 9, 2023
@algorithms-keeperalgorithms-keeperBot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 9, 2023
@quant12345

quant12345 commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tianyizheng02@cclauss A couple of days ago carmichael_number - add doctests. Do I need to delete this pull request (in 'Files changed' there is gcd)? At the bottom there was an inscription about a merge conflict. I made edits taking into account greatest_common_divisor. Now there is no warning. But will there be problems if there is a merger?

@tianyizheng02

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, there shouldn't be any problems. This PR has already been merged so it can't be "deleted" anyway. For your other PR, GitHub will merge it into the updated codebase, the one with this PR already merged.

@isidroasisidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementThis PR modified some existing filesmerge conflictsOpen a new PR or rebase on the latest commit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concatenate/consolidate all algorithms with different implementations

4 participants

@Siddikpatel@tianyizheng02@quant12345@cclauss