Skip to content

Relicense under MIT? #89

Open
Open
Relicense under MIT?#89
Labels
help wantedExtra attention is neededin-discussionquestionFurther information is requested

Description

@Panquesito7
Panquesito7
opened on Feb 9, 2024

Description

The GNU LGPLv2.1 is more suited for libraries, and I'm not sure this is the license we want for this project.
We should give the most freedom to everyone without any problems, as long as they give credit.

What do you think about relicensing the whole project under MIT? It's a much more permissive license as well as simple and short. I'm not a lawyer, but I think we need to ask all the contributors to agree to relicense the project under a different license (in this case, MIT).

Contributors that have agreed to relicensing under MIT

Let me know if you agree to this below. Thanks! 🙂

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedExtra attention is neededin-discussionquestionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions