Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Portrait Mode (WIP) - #18

Draft
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe
Draft

Portrait Mode (WIP)#18
IzaakBH wants to merge 30 commits into
mainfrom
portrait-mediapipe

Conversation

@IzaakBH

@IzaakBHIzaakBH commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Portrait mode with MediaPipe.

473440098_3921037358214522_8119052170283345346_n

472567077_1662751194594328_6371246227974615024_n

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/plugins/Portrait.kt Outdated
}
}

fun Bitmap.saveImage(context: Context): Uri? {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long term will just overwrite the saved image, but for now i wanna compare

Comment threadapp/src/main/java/co/stonephone/stonecamera/utils/ImageSegmenterHelper.kt Outdated

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,
var runningMode: RunningMode = RunningMode.IMAGE,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can set it to process on a live stream instead of images. I wonder if this will be preferable, performance wise, for the live view & how that would tie into the current plugin model?

@ISNIT0ISNIT0 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@ISNIT0
ISNIT0 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2025 08:43
- Old approach blurred the whole image & then applied the mask which is significantly more computationally expensive
- Also fixing some lint errors
@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

@IzaakBH

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Newly optimised blurring algo takes roughly 700ms on pixel 6a with a large radius of 25 (not including segmentation). Defo further optimisations to be had.

Will focus next on shoving it on a background thread & improving the smoothness of the blur

Also not 100% happy with the visuals of the blur, but can polish this later after getting the images to save in the correct orientation :D

stoneCameraViewModel: StoneCameraViewModel,
outputFileResults: ImageCapture.OutputFileResults
) {
val portraitModeSetting = stoneCameraViewModel.getSetting<String>("portraitMode") ?: "OFF"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should do this on a "mode" basis?

E.g. extend the Photo Mode plugin? Then there will be a mode option like most other camera apps?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I think this would be a good idea. Will make that change

private fun getOriginalImageRotation(contentResolver: ContentResolver, imageUri: Uri): Int {
val exifInputStream = contentResolver.openInputStream(imageUri)
val exif = ExifInterface(exifInputStream!!)
val rotation = when (exif.getAttributeInt(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more global for all modes? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image was being spat out sideways after blurring for some reason. No objection to making it more global

)
}

// Stolen from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418892/understanding-super-fast-blur-algorithm?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1w91ucNtw4nU-Z8Z9RyMYFVUHWxfgt7ivsE7foTkwR2wmdx2losQqQ0sk_aem_Zrf_8344PRxW6SFzutkE7g

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Borrowed from" 😉

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, isn't there a way we can shift this onto a shader?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not aware of shaders. will take a look

import com.google.mediapipe.tasks.vision.imagesegmenter.ImageSegmenterResult

class ImageSegmenterHelper(
var currentDelegate: Int = DELEGATE_CPU,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make sure we use GPU where possible?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was having trouble w/ gpu but yes, I agree. Will work on making that happen

}
}

when(currentModel) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all the models included in the build at this stage? How do we strip out the ones we're not using?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are not, have made changes to remove references to other models

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@IzaakBH@ISNIT0