Skip to content

question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

Description

@AlexMV12

Description

Hi guys,
Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

TLDR:

  • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
  • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

Thanks,
AlexMV12

Context

timecopilot==0.0.20

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
      Skip to content

      question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

      Description

      @AlexMV12

      Description

      Hi guys,
      Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

      I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

      Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

      However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

      TLDR:

      • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
      • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

      Thanks,
      AlexMV12

      Context

      timecopilot==0.0.20

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        questionFurther information is requested

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
          Skip to content

          question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

          Description

          @AlexMV12

          Description

          Hi guys,
          Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

          I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

          Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

          However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

          TLDR:

          • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
          • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

          Thanks,
          AlexMV12

          Context

          timecopilot==0.0.20

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            questionFurther information is requested

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
              Skip to content

              question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

              Description

              @AlexMV12

              Description

              Hi guys,
              Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

              I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

              Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

              However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

              TLDR:

              • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
              • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

              Thanks,
              AlexMV12

              Context

              timecopilot==0.0.20

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                questionFurther information is requested

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
                  Skip to content

                  question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

                  Description

                  @AlexMV12

                  Description

                  Hi guys,
                  Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

                  I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

                  Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

                  However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

                  TLDR:

                  • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
                  • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

                  Thanks,
                  AlexMV12

                  Context

                  timecopilot==0.0.20

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    questionFurther information is requested

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
                      Skip to content

                      question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

                      Description

                      @AlexMV12

                      Description

                      Hi guys,
                      Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

                      I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

                      Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

                      However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

                      TLDR:

                      • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
                      • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

                      Thanks,
                      AlexMV12

                      Context

                      timecopilot==0.0.20

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        questionFurther information is requested

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
                          Skip to content

                          question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

                          Description

                          @AlexMV12

                          Description

                          Hi guys,
                          Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

                          I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

                          Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

                          However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

                          TLDR:

                          • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
                          • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

                          Thanks,
                          AlexMV12

                          Context

                          timecopilot==0.0.20

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            questionFurther information is requested

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? · Issue #243 · TimeCopilot/timecopilot · GitHub
                              Skip to content

                              question: Is it possible to access cross-validation results/tune the cross-validation? #243

                              Description

                              @AlexMV12

                              Description

                              Hi guys,
                              Great job with Timecopilot. You are really pushing very interesting products and libraries in the last years. :)

                              I have one question/possible suggestion about Timecopilot: from what I have seen, it is not possible to understand how exactly the Agent performs the cross-validation.

                              Indeed, the cross_validation method of Forecaster has a default value for the windows parameter of 1. This would mean that the cross-validation is performed just on the last h points of the training-set.

                              However, seeing the logs, it seems clear that indeed the Agent is performing a more thourugh cross-validation.

                              TLDR:

                              • can we tune the cross-validation with analyze?
                              • can we access the "full" results of the cross-validation (i.e., the actual return value of cross_validation of the Forecaster)

                              Thanks,
                              AlexMV12

                              Context

                              timecopilot==0.0.20

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                questionFurther information is requested

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions