To support things like TravelMapping/Web#40 better we could add a field to each route with its position in the corresponding connected route. This wouldn't directly address "chopped up" routes like I-69, I-73, etc, as discussed in #55, and it would be nice to include a solution that would allow us to order those properly as well.
To support things like TravelMapping/Web#40 better we could add a field to each route with its position in the corresponding connected route. This wouldn't directly address "chopped up" routes like I-69, I-73, etc, as discussed in #55, and it would be nice to include a solution that would allow us to order those properly as well.