Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
…prefix convention Closes#17 Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
PR SummaryLow Risk Overview Updates the widget prefix taxonomy to treat Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9dd689b. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here. |
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 0 minutes and 59 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughDocumentation update clarifying that the Customer-Facing group functions as a cross-cutting view across the I/P/D layer system, where widgets retain their source-layer prefixes while the group itself remains unprefixed. Query value widgets in this group are exempted from prefix requirements. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
plugins/trogonstack-datadog/skills/datadog-review-dashboard/SKILL.md (1)
127-127: Consider consistent capitalization of "Query Value".Line 74 uses "Query Value widgets" (capitalized), while this line uses "query value widgets" (lowercase). For consistency and clarity when referring to a specific widget type in Datadog, consider using the same capitalization throughout.
📝 Suggested consistency fix
-**Principle**: A dedicated "Customer-Facing" group should exist at the top of the dashboard with 5-8 key metrics for immediate outage identification. The specific metrics should reflect the product's business — not just generic traffic and error rates. This group is a cross-cutting view — its timeseries widgets keep their source-layer prefix (`I`, `P`, or `D`), and its query value widgets need no prefix.+**Principle**: A dedicated "Customer-Facing" group should exist at the top of the dashboard with 5-8 key metrics for immediate outage identification. The specific metrics should reflect the product's business — not just generic traffic and error rates. This group is a cross-cutting view — its timeseries widgets keep their source-layer prefix (`I`, `P`, or `D`), and its Query Value widgets need no prefix.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@plugins/trogonstack-datadog/skills/datadog-review-dashboard/SKILL.md` at line 127, Standardize the capitalization of the Datadog widget type by changing "query value widgets" to "Query Value widgets" in SKILL.md so it matches the earlier usage ("Query Value widgets"); update every occurrence in the file (including the line in the "Customer-Facing" principle and any other references) to the same form to keep terminology consistent when referring to the specific widget type.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@plugins/trogonstack-datadog/skills/datadog-review-dashboard/SKILL.md`:
- Around line 74-75: The design doc and review guidance conflict: SKILL.md's
"Prefix every widget title" principle vs. the exemption for Query Value widgets
in the "Customer-Facing" group; update SKILL.md to resolve this by either (a)
documenting the Query Value exemption explicitly under the naming rules (mention
"Query Value widget" and "Customer-Facing group"), (b) stating whether the
exemption applies globally or only inside Customer-Facing (clarify rationale
about big-number indicators), or (c) removing the special-case and requiring
prefixes everywhere; ensure references to the principle "Prefix every widget
title" and the group name "Customer-Facing" are updated so designers know the
rule at creation time.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@plugins/trogonstack-datadog/skills/datadog-review-dashboard/SKILL.md`:
- Line 127: Standardize the capitalization of the Datadog widget type by
changing "query value widgets" to "Query Value widgets" in SKILL.md so it
matches the earlier usage ("Query Value widgets"); update every occurrence in
the file (including the line in the "Customer-Facing" principle and any other
references) to the same form to keep terminology consistent when referring to
the specific widget type.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 8ea03000-d8f8-40f3-a06d-48dd4cdb75d3
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugins/trogonstack-datadog/skills/datadog-review-dashboard/SKILL.md
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Adds `B0-N:` prefix for customer-visible outcomes and business transactions - Corrects `D` (Domain) description from "business metrics" to logical domain units - Replaces the "Customer-Facing" cross-cutting view concept with the B layer - Renames Section 5 and all references from Customer-Facing to Business Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
…shboard skill - Corrects D layer description from "business metrics" to domain units - Adds B layer throughout: SKILL.md, widgets.md layers table, classification guide, and all 4 layout templates in layouts.md - Renames "Customer-Facing" group to "Business" and updates prefixes from mixed I/P/D to B in all layout diagrams - Updates Dashboard Strategy table and Group Structure section Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
… business Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
| │ │ (QV+bg) │ (QV+bg) │ (QV+bg) │ (QV+bg) │ │ | ||
| │ ├──────────────────────┬────────────────────┤ │ | ||
| │ │ D0: Key txn success │ I0: DB conn pool │ │ | ||
| │ │ B0: Key txn success │ B1: DB conn pool │ │ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Infrastructure metrics incorrectly re-prefixed as Business layer
Medium Severity
Several infrastructure metrics in layout templates were blindly re-prefixed from I to B when the "Customer-Facing" group was renamed to "Business." Specifically: B1: DB conn pool (lines 74, 250) was formerly I0: DB conn pool, and B0: Host avail. / B1: Network errors (line 136) were formerly I0: prefixed. These are infrastructure metrics per the classification guide in widgets.md (databases, networks, OS resources), not business outcomes. The widgets.md examples were updated correctly to exclude non-B metrics from the Business group, but the layout templates were not — creating an internal inconsistency that will confuse the AI skill and produce incorrectly classified dashboards.
Additional Locations (2)
Summary
B(Business) as a proper 4th layer alongside I/P/D — for customer-visible outcomes and business transactionsD(Domain) description from "business metrics" to logical domain units in the system (bounded contexts, aggregates, domain components)datadog-review-dashboardanddatadog-design-dashboardskills, updating all prefixes, layout templates, classification guides, and quality checklistsCloses#17