Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

Description

@patricknelson

Affected Version

All versions of this module and SilverStripe

Description

This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

See below for an example.

Steps to Reproduce

For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

Recommendation

Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

      Description

      @patricknelson

      Affected Version

      All versions of this module and SilverStripe

      Description

      This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

      See below for an example.

      Steps to Reproduce

      For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

      However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

      Recommendation

      Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

          Description

          @patricknelson

          Affected Version

          All versions of this module and SilverStripe

          Description

          This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

          See below for an example.

          Steps to Reproduce

          For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

          However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

          Recommendation

          Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

              Description

              @patricknelson

              Affected Version

              All versions of this module and SilverStripe

              Description

              This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

              See below for an example.

              Steps to Reproduce

              For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

              However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

              Recommendation

              Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

                  Description

                  @patricknelson

                  Affected Version

                  All versions of this module and SilverStripe

                  Description

                  This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

                  See below for an example.

                  Steps to Reproduce

                  For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

                  However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

                  Recommendation

                  Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

                      Description

                      @patricknelson

                      Affected Version

                      All versions of this module and SilverStripe

                      Description

                      This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

                      See below for an example.

                      Steps to Reproduce

                      For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

                      However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

                      Recommendation

                      Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

                          Description

                          @patricknelson

                          Affected Version

                          All versions of this module and SilverStripe

                          Description

                          This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

                          See below for an example.

                          Steps to Reproduce

                          For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

                          However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

                          Recommendation

                          Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Feature: Add extension to allow consistency without requiring loading of the GridField #138

                              Description

                              @patricknelson

                              Affected Version

                              All versions of this module and SilverStripe

                              Description

                              This GridField component allows some pretty advanced functionality; namely, the ability to manually sort items regardless of the type of relation, which is extremely handy. The one major drawback that I've noticed is that if you're attempting to augment/manipulate that relation from any other context then sorting is not handled at all. At least, not until the CMS user happens to navigate to view/load the grid field, at which point there could be unpredictable behavior.

                              See below for an example.

                              Steps to Reproduce

                              For example (this happens to be my use case): Say you have a many-to-many relation from a HomePage which features multiple StoryArticle objects. From the context of the StoryArticle you might want to enable/disable featuring to the HomePage via a checkbox. However, you also need to have explicit and manual control over the sorting of items which get featured there (i.e. via GridField and this component). Also, logically, the idea in this scenario that the act of featuring an article will place this object at the top, thus ->append_to_top is set to true, however this is done from the context of the GridField component.

                              However, if the user checks the box to feature the story on the homepage, the association will be created, but the sort field (e.g. Sort on the pivot HomePage_FeaturedStoryArticles.Sort) will remain 0 until the user happens to navigate to view the GridField in the CMS, which may be in a completely different area. This is particularly problematic if multiple are configured this way over time and now multiple will sit at 0 and then will be reordered only once the GridField is viewed. This is the "unpredictable" behavior mentioned above, as the sorting result at this point may choose a different order (derived from ID and Created, for example) which may not align with the actual order in which these items were actually associated in time.

                              Recommendation

                              Abstract the logic which handles the sorting sufficiently such that it can also be implemented either by an extension or at least called statically (e.g. SortableGridField::fixSortRelation($owner, $relationList) or similar). This would allow operations to occur that aren't tightly coupled to a UI layer like GridField such as in the example scenario above.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions