Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Improved comment consistency - #3
Open
Markyroson wants to merge 10 commits into
Open
Conversation
Changed to a style seen within the Unreal Engine 4 example projects.
Modified casing of comments to create consistency with other classes
Changed comment casing in order to create consistency as well as removed unneeded asterisks.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I improved the style consistency of comments within the code so that the file comments are uniform in style (not with a comment starting with lower case in one spot and capital letter everywhere else, removed unnecessary asterisks in comments, created block comments rather than single line comments comprising a block, etc).
Hopefully these changed help. I have deliberately left the 'Allow edits from maintainers' option checked so that you may edit this as you see fit or see any errors within it.
This addresses issue #4