Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes by fooSynaptic · Pull Request #351 · VectifyAI/PageIndex · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes - #351

Open
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330
Open

fix: handle missing nodes key in get_leaf_nodes#351
fooSynaptic wants to merge 1 commit into
VectifyAI:mainfrom
fooSynaptic:fix/get-leaf-nodes-keyerror-330

Conversation

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes#330

Problem

get_leaf_nodes() crashes with KeyError: 'nodes' when traversing trees built by list_to_tree().

list_to_tree() runs clean_node() on every node. For nodes with no children, clean_node()deletes the nodes key entirely (del node['nodes']), rather than leaving it as an empty list. Later, get_leaf_nodes() checks leaf status via structure['nodes'], which raises KeyError on those nodes.

Fix

Use .get('nodes') instead of direct key access:

ifnotstructure.get('nodes'):

When the key is absent, .get('nodes') returns None (falsy), so the node is correctly treated as a leaf. This matches how other helpers in the same file already access nodes (e.g. format_structure, is_leaf_node).

Tests

Added tests/test_issue_330.py:

  • leaf dict without a nodes key is returned as a leaf
  • list_to_tree()get_leaf_nodes() end-to-end traversal does not raise

pytest tests/test_issue_330.py -v — 2 passed locally.

@fooSynaptic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @KylinMountain — gentle ping when you have a moment.

This PR fixes #330 (KeyError: 'nodes' in get_leaf_nodes after list_to_tree()). I noticed a similar one-line fix was merged in #331, but main still has the direct structure['nodes'] access, so this re-applies the guard and adds regression tests in tests/test_issue_330.py.

Happy to adjust anything per your feedback — thanks for maintaining PageIndex!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: get_leaf_nodes raises KeyError on leaf nodes due to missing nodes key

1 participant

@fooSynaptic