This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526

Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open

Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features

Conversation

@dstorey

@dstoreydstorey commented Dec 6, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.

This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.

@NielsLeenheer

NielsLeenheer commented Dec 7, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.

@dstorey

dstorey commented Dec 11, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?

@SC1040-TS2

SC1040-TS2 commented Mar 10, 2018•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.

Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.

@dstorey

dstorey commented Mar 10, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.

@niutech

niutech commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove old rejected features - #526
Open
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Open
Remove old rejected features#526
dstorey wants to merge 2 commits into
WebPlatformTest:version-9.0from 
dstorey:Remove-old-zeropoint-features
Conversation
@dstorey
@dstoreydstorey
commented
Dec 6, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
scriptExecutionEvents have long since been removed from the spec. Imports doesn't have wide support and has been replaced in this test by ES Modules.
This PR removed those rejected features to not clutter the test up with old features.
@NielsLeenheer
NielsLeenheer
commented
Dec 7, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
I'd like to keep the feature detects in the engine.js file. Even though these features would be invisible to any visitor of HTML5test and wouldn't get any points, I can still track whether or not browsers support it.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Dec 11, 2017

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
makes sense, but should they be removed from the actual results and compare page?
@SC1040-TS2
SC1040-TS2
commented
Mar 10, 2018•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I would think, @dstorey, as it would make sense to include them in the results and Compare pages to allow the less programming-inclined page visitors to view and assess them, given the implications of supporting Rejected specifications such as the aforementioned Script execution events.
Though, maybe their point value should be universally marked as X (Web SQL Database still isn't), or otherwise have a note much like the ones for the Directories and System API and Web SQL Database features added to signify their deprecation, and the lack of benefit in supporting them.
@dstorey
dstorey
commented
Mar 10, 2018

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
I would argue that things like SEE have been long forgotten about considering they're in no spec people can look up and have not been implemented by most browsers.
@niutech
niutech
commented
Sep 22, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

I've merged this PR into my HTML5Test fork.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dstorey@NielsLeenheer@SC1040-TS2@niutech