Integrated CleanUnwantedUpdates - #25
Conversation
AnrDaemon
commented
Feb 19, 2016
And how is this overengineered byproduct of brain activity any better than a straightforward batch file? |
KOLANICH
commented
Feb 19, 2016
It does more :) |
AnrDaemon
commented
Feb 19, 2016
Does it NEED to do more, to begin with? ? |
KOLANICH
commented
Feb 20, 2016
For now - no (the additional functionality detecting suspicious updates (the ones having keywords for now, you can plug an additional heuristics into it) is not activated by default, to activate it you need to either edit config every time you need it (it deactivates itself to prevent abuse (when it is fully enabled, it downloads and parses the pages with updates descriptions)), or edit the source to remove self-deactivation).
Bad. In order to hide an update you have to use WSH script. Why not to move entire functionality into WSH then? Again, the purpose of that tool was not only to delete the updates, but also to detect the suspicious ones and ask the user to examine them manually. |
AnrDaemon
commented
Feb 21, 2016
Any heuristic is fail-prone. Which means, it is essentially unsafe. I'm not going to place my system at risk. |
KOLANICH
commented
Feb 21, 2016
Don't make such a statements without examining the code. It DOESN'T remove updates based on heuristics, it just advises the updates to be checked manually. The main source of unsafety in my script is the possibility to exploit the vulns in ActiveX components used. |
AnrDaemon
commented
Feb 21, 2016
Then again, if you make an application, that ONLY checking for possible suspicious updates (and then again, Microsoft rarely gives any meaningful info to such updates, largely only reposting the list of binaries included), I see the reason to refer to your application as a potentially useful additional tool. |
Replaces builtin script with CleanUnwantedUpdates