Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering - #10452

Closed
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api
Closed

Abilities API: Use stricter doing_action check when registering#10452
gziolo wants to merge 2 commits into
WordPress:trunkfrom
gziolo:update/use-doing-action-abilities-api

Conversation

@gziolo

@gziologziolo commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64098

Follow-up for #9410.

Raised by @JasonTheAdams and @felixarntz in WordPress/abilities-api#126 (comment):

I'm curious why we're using did_action() and not doing_action?

I did provide similar feedback somewhere else (I believe on the Core PR) - I think allowing registration at any arbitrary point means we're being "forgiving" to developers doing it wrong, which can then lead to far more obscure problems down the line.

I think clearly defined APIs and, given WordPress's procedural nature, clearly defined registration timing are crucial to avoid more complex problems. Better tell the developer they should fix something rather than them running into a problem later that they have no idea on why it's occurring.

Although the code modifications were simple, getting the unit tests to pass was quite an adventure. I'm still not entirely convinced I took the most elegant approach for simulating the proper conditions, but my focus was to make the tests pass with the minimal set of changes necessary.


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@gziologziolo self-assigned this Nov 2, 2025
@gziolo
gziolo marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2025 17:38
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@felixarntzfelixarntz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gziolo, looks great!

Comment on lines -21 to -30
// Fire the init hook to allow test ability category registration.
do_action( 'wp_abilities_api_categories_init' );
wp_register_ability_category(
'math',
array(
'label' => 'Math',
'description' => 'Mathematical operations and calculations.',
)
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is removed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t mandatory at this level.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then remove wp_unregister_ability_category( 'math' ); from tear_down method.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I’ll look into it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback applied 👍

pento pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Applies feedback provided that doing_action would be better check on this situation to avoid developers facing future registration timing issues.
Developed in #10452.
Props gziolo, jorgefilipecosta, flixos90, mukesh27, jason_the_adams.
See #64098.
git-svn-id: https://develop.svn.wordpress.org/trunk@61130 602fd350-edb4-49c9-b593-d223f7449a82
@jorgefilipecosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Committed at fd41ccd.

@gziolo
gziolo deleted the update/use-doing-action-abilities-api branch November 5, 2025 08:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@gziolo@jorgefilipecosta@felixarntz@mukeshpanchal27