Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add findInPath method to locate all matching executables in the system path - #609
Conversation
smorimoto
commented
Oct 19, 2020
Could you check this? @ericsciple@bryanmacfarlane |
smorimoto
commented
Oct 20, 2020
smorimoto
commented
Oct 22, 2020
We won't be able to work on fixing a lot of cache-related issues until we've done this. |
smorimoto
commented
Oct 29, 2020
@joshmgross Hi Josh. Sorry to keep pinging you all, but this is one of the steps needed to speed up actions/cache and avoid some bugs. Could you check it? |
smorimoto
commented
Jan 27, 2021
ping |
9468eb1 to
9db7742Comparesmorimoto
commented
Jan 28, 2021
Be-ing
commented
Feb 7, 2021
ping |
smorimoto
commented
Feb 14, 2021
@joshmgross@dhadka When using cache action on Windows with the Cygwin environment, we have to merge the PR that requires this change, and the delay in reviewing this is literally blocking all those tasks. |
Be-ing
commented
Feb 25, 2021
ping! Please prioritize whatever it takes to use zstd reliably on Windows. Decompressing a 1 GB cache on Windows takes 5 minutes per job! |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 5, 2021
@dhadka Can you assign a person about this? Other team members seem to have no interest in working on this topic. |
dhadka
commented
Mar 9, 2021
@actions/actions-runtime Can we please get a review on this PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look good.
If you could add some tests though that would be great! Good to have for future maintenance. We have some existing ones here: https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/main/packages/io/__tests__/io.test.ts
0364793 to
aa6bdefComparesmorimoto
commented
Mar 10, 2021
@konradpabjan I just added the simplest test. |
e1b358a to
aa6bdefComparesmorimoto
commented
Mar 10, 2021
There are a lot of irrelevant changes after I changed what I was concerned, so I will do them in another PR. Anyway, this PR is ready to merge. |
dhadka
commented
Mar 10, 2021
Thanks! @konradpabjan can you please give this another look and a ✔️ for |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 10, 2021
Actually, the coverage isn't as bad as we thought. |
@dhadka As for actions-service, the review request is made because of the unrelated commit (I already excluded them), so we can ignore it. |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 11, 2021
Thanks again 🙂 |
thboop
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Left some minor comments but lets get a new version of this out once they have been addressed!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…m path Signed-off-by: Sora Morimoto <sora@morimoto.io>
smorimoto
commented
Mar 15, 2021
@thboop now all points have been fixed! |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 16, 2021
Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to finish. |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 18, 2021
dhadka
commented
Mar 20, 2021
Changes LGTM, ready to 🚀 once @thboop gives the 👍 |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 23, 2021
ping @thboop |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 24, 2021
Hi? @thboop |
thboop
commented
Mar 24, 2021
Hey @smorimoto , I'll take a look at this next week and see if we can get a new release out. We typically have longer turnaround times for new features in open source repositories, as any feature requires further maintenance and support in the long term by our team. I'll be updating the repo with some templates to set better guidance for contributors in the future, I'm sorry for the churn this has caused you. |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 25, 2021
Thanks. I can understand the reason itself, but to be honest I'm quite skeptical about the fact that it would be a reasonable reason for hardly do a review for 6 months. And that seems to conflict with the reason why we do versioning in software in general. In any case, I hope we can make a "fix" (not an improvement!) for actions/cache as soon as possible. |
Be-ing
commented
Mar 25, 2021
I also think you should reconsider your processes if it takes 6 months to review a rather small pull request. |
smorimoto
commented
Mar 29, 2021
I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels that. In fact, the most PRs sent to the Actions repositories are well-known to require 100 pings to move the review process forward. This is a real loss for both GitHub and its users. |
smorimoto
commented
Apr 2, 2021
ping? |
dhadka
commented
Apr 2, 2021
🚀 |
dhadka
commented
Apr 2, 2021
@konradpabjan Can we please get a new version of this built? |
thboop
commented
Apr 2, 2021
Thanks for the contribution @smorimoto and being patient with the delay, working on a new npm release now 🚀 🚀 |
smorimoto
commented
Apr 2, 2021
That was quick. |
thboop
commented
Apr 2, 2021
@actions/io v1.1.0 has been published 🚀 🚀 🚀 |
David is the original author. This PR is mainly for #610.