feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166

Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

Conversation

@lan17

@lan17lan17 commented Apr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails

Why

The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.

Impact

Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.

Validation

  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@lan17lan17 changed the title [codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17 marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo reviewed Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?

@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).

IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.

namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo reviewed Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
with pytest.raises(
ValidationError,
match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?

@lan17
lan17 merged commit 03f402e into mainApr 20, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@lan17
lan17 deleted the codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits branch April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation

galileo-automation commented Apr 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

released

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits - #166
Merged
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Apr 20, 2026
Merged
feat(server): Align condition and template depth limits#166
lan17 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits
Conversation
@lan17
@lan17lan17
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • increase the shared condition nesting depth limit from 6 to 12
  • make MAX_TEMPLATE_DEFINITION_DEPTH derive from MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH so both limits stay aligned
  • expand the condition-depth model test to verify depth 12 succeeds and depth 13 still fails
Why
The condition-tree limit had been raised independently, but the template definition depth used a separate constant value. Referencing the shared constant removes drift and keeps template-backed controls aligned with the same supported nesting depth.
Impact
Template-backed and non-template control validation now share one source of truth for depth limits. Future changes to the condition limit will automatically apply to template definition depth as well.
Validation
  • make test TEST= models/tests/test_controls.py (this invoked the repo's full default make test chain and passed across models, telemetry, server, engine, Python SDK, and builtin evaluators)
  • make models-test
@codecov
codecovBot
commented
Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Codecov Report
✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!
@lan17lan17
changed the title
[codex] Align condition and template depth limitsfeat(server): Align condition and template depth limitsApr 7, 2026
@lan17
lan17
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 7, 2026 20:01
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/src/agent_control_models/controls.py
type TemplateValue = str | bool | list[str]
type JsonValue = JSONValue

MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH = 12
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think a normal usecase would need this much depth? what was hte motivation behind doubling it?
@lan17lan17Apr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They might depending on how complex the Control is, which they might get complex if we generate them using LLMs (which i did for Leon The Controller).
IMO we should not dictate a shallow depth just because we are afraid users will misuse it. We should leave it up to them. We should have some depth that prevents some perf issues tho, so I would push this limit even higher in the future.
namrataghadi-galileo
namrataghadi-galileo
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment threadmodels/tests/test_controls.py
 with pytest.raises(
 ValidationError,
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 6",
 match="Condition nesting depth exceeds maximum of 12",
@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileoApr 7, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use the constant MAX_CONDITION_DEPTH here instead?
@lan17
lan17
merged commit 03f402e
into
mainApr 20, 2026

6 of 7 checks passed

@lan17
lan17
deleted the

codex/align-condition-template-depth-limits

branch
April 20, 2026 01:20
galileo-automation pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2026
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): ts sdk v2.4.0 [skip ci]
694067c
## [2.4.0](ts-sdk-v2.3.0...ts-sdk-v2.4.0) (2026-04-22)
### Features
* **evaluators:** add built-in budget evaluator for per-agent cost tracking ([#144](#144)) ([d4ce113](d4ce113)), closes [#130](#130)
* **sdk:** add external sink ([#175](#175)) ([45f3645](45f3645))
* **server:** Align condition and template depth limits ([#166](#166)) ([03f402e](03f402e))
* **server:** Phase 0: add control version history and soft-delete unusable legacy controls ([#172](#172)) ([e5b2b33](e5b2b33))
### Bug Fixes
* **examples:** fix crewai examples ([#179](#179)) ([9004ea3](9004ea3))
@galileo-automation
galileo-automation
commented
Apr 22, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@namrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileonamrataghadi-galileo left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

released

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lan17@galileo-automation@namrataghadi-galileo