Skip to content

feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17

Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged

feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

Conversation

@aryeko

@aryekoaryeko commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8

Boundaries

  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run

Verification

  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check

Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.

@aryeko
aryeko merged commit 5c72926 into mainJul 4, 2026
1 check passed
@aryeko
aryeko deleted the feat/model-judge-hardening-v018 branch July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot reviewed Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit:556a852600

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
for (const item of finalResult.items) {
counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
}
const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts

When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting by aryeko · Pull Request #17 · agentic-workflow-kit/eval-kit · GitHub
Skip to content
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting - #17
Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Jul 4, 2026
Merged
feat: harden pointwise model-judge reporting#17
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
feat/model-judge-hardening-v018
Conversation
@aryeko
@aryekoaryeko
commented
Jul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Summary
  • add generic pointwise verdict summary and calibration-report helpers
  • fail closed on pointwise judge result/provider/prompt/rubric mismatches and required run metadata
  • harden pointwise artifact/output path validation against absolute, escaping, whitespace, and non-normalized paths
  • update docs, skills, changelog, and version metadata for v0.1.8
Boundaries
  • eval-kit mechanics and generic policy only
  • no consumer semantics, prompts, fixtures, or configs changed
  • no provider-backed evals run
Verification
  • pnpm format
  • pnpm test -- tests/pointwise.test.mjs
  • pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
  • pnpm check
  • git diff --check
Independent pre-PR review approved after two fix loops for pointwise artifact-path validation.
@aryeko
aryeko
merged commit 5c72926
into
mainJul 4, 2026

1 check passed

@aryeko
aryeko
deleted the

feat/model-judge-hardening-v018

branch
July 4, 2026 03:14
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]
chatgpt-codex-connectorBot
reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
View reviewed changes
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBot
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit:556a852600
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Comment threadsrc/sdk.mjs
 for (const item of finalResult.items) {
 counts[item.verdict] = (counts[item.verdict] ?? 0) + 1;
 }
 const counts = countPointwiseVerdicts(finalResult.items);
@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connectorBotJul 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate pointwise verdicts before writing artifacts
When an adapter's canonicalizeExpectedItemMetadata returns a typo or new verdict, this new helper throws, but pointwise-result.json has already been overwritten just above. If the same run id is reused, the command exits before regenerating the report or manifest, leaving the previous manifest/report pointing at a replaced invalid result file. Move the verdict validation/counting before writing result artifacts so failed runs do not corrupt an existing bundle.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chatgpt-codex-connectorchatgpt-codex-connector[bot]chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@aryeko