Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML by akutuva21 · Pull Request #540 · akutuva21/PyBioNetGen · GitHub
Skip to content

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML - #540

Merged
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Refactor actionable unit split heuristic in analyzeSBML#540
akutuva21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refactored the split heuristic in analyzeSBML.py when actionable unit extraction natively fails. It now checks for direct matches or uses greedyModificationMatching() before falling back to string splitting.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12583549134731861659 started by @akutuva21

Instead of doing a simple split by `_` when extracting actionable units, we now compare against `strippedMolecules` and split by smallest actionable units utilizing `self.greedyModificationMatching()`. If `greedyModificationMatching()` fails to find a valid match, we fall back to splitting the string by `_`.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 15:13
@akutuva21
akutuva21 merged commit 37deb95 into mainJun 16, 2026
18 checks passed
@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the refactor-split-heuristic-12583549134731861659 branch July 20, 2026 17:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21