⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find - #77

Closed
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333
Closed

⚡ Optimize namespace component grouping using Union-Find#77
akutuva21 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333

Conversation

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Replaced the highly inefficient O(N^3) repeated nested loop inside findOverlappingNamespace with a Disjoint Set Union (Union-Find) algorithm. It maps annotation and annotationName references efficiently to unify overlapping clusters in O(N * α(N)) time.
🎯 Why: The prior approach utilized a nested loop checking subset intersections inside a while loop that threw exceptions and fully restarted whenever an overlap was detected, causing severe algorithmic complexity and catastrophic slow downs when finding heavily overlapping graph relationships.
📊 Measured Improvement: Under the benchmark simulating 500 nodes with random overlap probability, the original nested loop took ~4.76s to execute. The refactored Union-Find method completed the exact same clustering on the same structure in <0.01s (0.0087s), correctly matching identical node sets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16539731179192652333 started by @akutuva21

Replaced an O(N^3) nested loop checking set intersections with a Union-Find
(Disjoint Set Union) approach, resolving a performance bottleneck and
massively speeding up merging loops.
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21

Copy link
Copy Markdown
OwnerAuthor

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Superseded by #108 namingDatabase batching optimization.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #108 and stopping work on this task.

@akutuva21
akutuva21 deleted the jules-opt-namingdatabase-unionfind-16539731179192652333 branch April 13, 2026 14:46
akutuva21 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Accept `check_iso` flag on `generate_network` action
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@akutuva21