🧪 Add test file for scripts/utils.js - #37
Conversation
Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🎯 What: The testing gap for
scripts/utils.jsspecificallylistModelFileswas addressed.📊 Coverage: Test coverage was added for scenarios such as returning only
.bnglfiles, correctly ordering them alphabetically, ignoring directories (even if named with.bngl), ignoring non-.bnglextensions, and properly handling empty directories. The tests utilize temporary folders ensuring isolation and automatic cleanup without modifying the real codebase layout.✨ Result: The
scripts/utils.jsutility functions are now thoroughly tested, improving test coverage and safety for future refactoring efforts without flakiness.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12817230383589720297 started by @akutuva21