Skip to content

Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

Description

@SaveCodeHere

Apache Airflow version

3.0.0

If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

3.0.0

What happened?

After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

I propose two solutions

  1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
  2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

What you think should happen instead?

it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

How to reproduce

Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

Operating System

Debian bookworm 12.10

Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

No response

Deployment

Other Docker-based deployment

Deployment details

Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

Anything else?

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
    Skip to content

    Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

    Description

    @SaveCodeHere

    Apache Airflow version

    3.0.0

    If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

    3.0.0

    What happened?

    After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

    Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

    I propose two solutions

    1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
    2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

    What you think should happen instead?

    it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

    How to reproduce

    Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

    Operating System

    Debian bookworm 12.10

    Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

    No response

    Deployment

    Other Docker-based deployment

    Deployment details

    Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

    Anything else?

    No response

    Are you willing to submit PR?

    • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

    Code of Conduct

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
      Skip to content

      Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

      Description

      @SaveCodeHere

      Apache Airflow version

      3.0.0

      If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

      3.0.0

      What happened?

      After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

      Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

      I propose two solutions

      1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
      2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

      What you think should happen instead?

      it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

      How to reproduce

      Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

      Operating System

      Debian bookworm 12.10

      Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

      No response

      Deployment

      Other Docker-based deployment

      Deployment details

      Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

      Anything else?

      No response

      Are you willing to submit PR?

      • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

      Code of Conduct

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
        Skip to content

        Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

        Description

        @SaveCodeHere

        Apache Airflow version

        3.0.0

        If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

        3.0.0

        What happened?

        After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

        Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

        I propose two solutions

        1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
        2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

        What you think should happen instead?

        it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

        How to reproduce

        Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

        Operating System

        Debian bookworm 12.10

        Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

        No response

        Deployment

        Other Docker-based deployment

        Deployment details

        Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

        Anything else?

        No response

        Are you willing to submit PR?

        • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

        Code of Conduct

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
          Skip to content

          Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

          Description

          @SaveCodeHere

          Apache Airflow version

          3.0.0

          If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

          3.0.0

          What happened?

          After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

          Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

          I propose two solutions

          1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
          2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

          What you think should happen instead?

          it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

          How to reproduce

          Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

          Operating System

          Debian bookworm 12.10

          Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

          No response

          Deployment

          Other Docker-based deployment

          Deployment details

          Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

          Anything else?

          No response

          Are you willing to submit PR?

          • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

          Code of Conduct

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
            Skip to content

            Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

            Description

            @SaveCodeHere

            Apache Airflow version

            3.0.0

            If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

            3.0.0

            What happened?

            After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

            Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

            I propose two solutions

            1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
            2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

            What you think should happen instead?

            it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

            How to reproduce

            Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

            Operating System

            Debian bookworm 12.10

            Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

            No response

            Deployment

            Other Docker-based deployment

            Deployment details

            Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

            Anything else?

            No response

            Are you willing to submit PR?

            • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

            Code of Conduct

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
              Skip to content

              Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

              Description

              @SaveCodeHere

              Apache Airflow version

              3.0.0

              If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

              3.0.0

              What happened?

              After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

              Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

              I propose two solutions

              1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
              2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

              What you think should happen instead?

              it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

              How to reproduce

              Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

              Operating System

              Debian bookworm 12.10

              Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

              No response

              Deployment

              Other Docker-based deployment

              Deployment details

              Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

              Anything else?

              No response

              Are you willing to submit PR?

              • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

              Code of Conduct

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. · Issue #50025 · apache/airflow · GitHub
                Skip to content

                Forced busybox init_container in kubernetes executor after upgrade to v3. #50025

                Description

                @SaveCodeHere

                Apache Airflow version

                3.0.0

                If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?

                3.0.0

                What happened?

                After switching our environment airflow 3.0.0, the kubernetesexecutor worker forces an init-container with busybox image.

                Our environment is walled off and we do not have access to outside resources, thus, all airflow executors now fails on start-up with the init.

                I propose two solutions

                1. Add config option to change and/or overwrite the forced init-container configuration
                2. . Add config option to skip the forced init-container all together

                What you think should happen instead?

                it should not force an init container that makes walled off environment fail after 3.0.0 upgrade

                How to reproduce

                Start a dag with kubernetes executor in kubernetes environment

                Operating System

                Debian bookworm 12.10

                Versions of Apache Airflow Providers

                No response

                Deployment

                Other Docker-based deployment

                Deployment details

                Openshift/Kubernetes deploy

                Anything else?

                No response

                Are you willing to submit PR?

                • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

                Code of Conduct

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions