Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Extract Dask executor to daskexecutor provider - #32772
Merged
Merged
Conversation
potiuk
requested review from
XD-DENG, ashb, dstandish, jedcunningham, kaxil, o-nikolas and pierrejeambrun
as code ownersJuly 22, 2023 14:00
MemberAuthor
Based on #32780, so only last commit counts. |
potiukforce-pushed
the
create-dask-executor-provider
branch
5 times, most recently
from
July 23, 2023 08:43
8097e41 to
e439272Comparepotiukforce-pushed
the
create-dask-executor-provider
branch
from
July 24, 2023 18:34
e439272 to
bfafbe5Comparejedcunningham
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2023
potiuk
commented
Jul 24, 2023
MemberAuthor
radom failure. Merging. |
69 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.