Skip to content

Move FSHook/PackageIndexHook/SubprocessHook to standard provider - #42506

Merged
romsharon98 merged 5 commits into
apache:mainfrom
gopidesupavan:standard-provider-hooks
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Move FSHook/PackageIndexHook/SubprocessHook to standard provider#42506
romsharon98 merged 5 commits into
apache:mainfrom
gopidesupavan:standard-provider-hooks

Conversation

@gopidesupavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Moving FSHook, PackageIndexHook, SubprocessHook to standard provider


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@gopidesupavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

oh few tests are failing, looking at now.

Comment threadairflow/providers/standard/hooks/subprocess.py Outdated
@romsharon98
romsharon98 merged commit 61d1dbb into apache:mainOct 1, 2024
@gopidesupavan
gopidesupavan deleted the standard-provider-hooks branch October 1, 2024 21:02
@gopidesupavan
gopidesupavan restored the standard-provider-hooks branch October 2, 2024 09:22
joaopamaral pushed a commit to joaopamaral/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
…che#42506)
* move hooks to standard providers
* fix document build and adding hooks to provider yaml file
* adding fshook tests
* marking as db test
* doc reference update to subprocess hook
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
…che#42506)
* move hooks to standard providers
* fix document build and adding hooks to provider yaml file
* adding fshook tests
* marking as db test
* doc reference update to subprocess hook
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gopidesupavan@romsharon98