Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix pre-commit checking provider's doc consistency - #45803
Merged
Conversation
potiukforce-pushed
the
fix-providers-doc-check-pre-commit
branch
from
January 20, 2025 15:44
ab62bef to
77f4688Comparepotiuk
commented
Jan 20, 2025
MemberAuthor
Example output:
|
eladkal
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2025
The pre-commit was not working since the move of providers to the `providers` top-level folder (apache#42505) - but we also have not added many new providers since. This PR updates the check to work again only for providers that follow the new structure and to be more verbose on what it is doing.
potiukforce-pushed
the
fix-providers-doc-check-pre-commit
branch
from
January 20, 2025 16:28
77f4688 to
b798421Comparedauinh pushed a commit
to dauinh/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2025
The pre-commit was not working since the move of providers to the `providers` top-level folder (apache#42505) - but we also have not added many new providers since. This PR updates the check to work again only for providers that follow the new structure and to be more verbose on what it is doing.
got686-yandex pushed a commit
to got686-yandex/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
The pre-commit was not working since the move of providers to the `providers` top-level folder (apache#42505) - but we also have not added many new providers since. This PR updates the check to work again only for providers that follow the new structure and to be more verbose on what it is doing.
niklasr22 pushed a commit
to niklasr22/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2025
The pre-commit was not working since the move of providers to the `providers` top-level folder (apache#42505) - but we also have not added many new providers since. This PR updates the check to work again only for providers that follow the new structure and to be more verbose on what it is doing.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The pre-commit was not working since the move of providers to the
providerstop-level folder (#42505) - but we also have not added many new providers since. This PR updates the check to work again only for providers that follow the new structure and to be more verbose on what it is doing.^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.