Move SMTP Provider to new structure

[shubhamraj-git]

related to #46045

• No pending PR's for SMTP

We have a DRAFT PR opened yesterday which affects SMTP Provider by @hussein-awala

• Ran breeze testing providers-tests --test-type 'Providers[ssh]'
• Ran Static checks

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[shubhamraj-git]

@hussein-awala I see we have DRAFT PR which relates to SMTP Provider, this migration can create conflicts. Are you okay with it or should we postpone this migration till you merge your PR?
This PR is ready to be merge state.

[hussein-awala]

As the process of moving a provider is almost automated (according to some comments from Jarek in other PRs if I'm not mistaken), I prefer to wait until the other PR is merged.

[shubhamraj-git]

Yes, It's an automated process. I can do it post your PR gets merged.

[potiuk]

Yeah. It looks like we could start to batch those changes - since they are generating conflicts.

[potiuk]

As the process of moving a provider is almost automated (according to some comments from Jarek in other PRs if I'm not mistaken), I prefer to wait until the other PR is merged.

Maybe we can merge it anyway. It will be rather easy to rebase your PR @hussein-awala and we still need to agree on the change from your PR :)

[o-nikolas]

As the process of moving a provider is almost automated (according to some comments from Jarek in other PRs if I'm not mistaken), I prefer to wait until the other PR is merged.

Maybe we can merge it anyway. It will be rather easy to rebase your PR @hussein-awala and we still need to agree on the change from your PR :)

Given that the email discussions are still ongoing and the PR remains in draft. Shall we merge this one?

[jscheffl]

Anything holding us back? I think this looks good to merge.

[hussein-awala]

I split my PR into many smaller ones, I need to merge #46219 before rebasing and merging this one. I'll try to fix the failing tests tomorrow or Saturday.

[potiuk]

Instead of rebasing it I created #46556 anew - it seems that it should work out of the box - easier than solve conflicts with this one.

[shubhamraj-git]

@potiuk Yaa, thanks!