Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add bundle_version to DagRun response - #49726

Merged
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

Add bundle_version to DagRun response#49726
dstandish merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
astronomer:add-bundle-version-to-dag-run

Conversation

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The field was missing.

Note on relationship to #49007...

In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.

The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.

Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.

closes#49007

@boring-cyborgboring-cyborgBot added area:airflow-ctl area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. labels Apr 24, 2025
@kaxilkaxil added this to the Airflow 3.0.1 milestone Apr 24, 2025

@pierrejeambrunpierrejeambrun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, we just need to update the tests.

Should we display this is the UI ? For instance in the details tab for dagrun, for now only versions in dag_versions are shown. (and there is a bundle there) but I guess we can add a DagRun.bundle_name section

@bbovenzi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

We might need to update the Dag Run Details page: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow-core/src/airflow/ui/src/pages/Run/Details.tsx#L140

Yeah so the dag versions are what the dag versions are... they are sort of useless for the user. For a dag run in a dag that uses a versioned bundle (yes, too many conceps), it will always point to just one dag version; though that dag version might correspond to a bundle version that was "old" at time dag run created.

all quite confusing, yes.

The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
@dstandish
dstandishforce-pushed the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch from f775164 to 441d895CompareApril 24, 2025 22:17
@dstandish

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the errors are related to edge executor; merging

@dstandish
dstandish merged commit b70ece0 into apache:mainApr 25, 2025
@dstandish
dstandish deleted the add-bundle-version-to-dag-run branch April 25, 2025 03:51
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to #49007...
In #49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closes#49007
(cherry picked from commit b70ece0)
jroachgolf84 pushed a commit to jroachgolf84/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
The field was missing.
Note on relationship to apache#49007...
In apache#49007 the concern was raised about the DagVersion record not pointing to the current bundle version when the bundle version changed but dag structure did not.
The user assumed that this meant the dag run was associated with the wrong bundle version. Adding the dag run bundle version will let the user see that that the associaton is correct.
Users may now see two "bundle versions" in the dag run response. But the reason for this can be understood. If the DagVersion record points to an older bundle version, it is because the dag structure did not change when the code changed. But since the scheduler just cares about dag structure, it doesn't matter, and it still tells the truth -- the version of the dag version is the bundle version which caused that revision.
closesapache#49007
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:airflow-ctlarea:APIAirflow's REST/HTTP APIarea:UIRelated to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Versioned dag run uses the latest version of serialized dag in the Scheduler instead of sticking to their version

4 participants

@dstandish@bbovenzi@pierrejeambrun@kaxil