Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[AIRFLOW-4899] Fix get_dataset_list from bigquery hook to return next… - #5565
[AIRFLOW-4899] Fix get_dataset_list from bigquery hook to return next…#5565benjamingrenier wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
eladkal
commented
Jul 11, 2019
Maybe out of scope but it still won't necessarily give all datasets. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Thanks for your comment. I added the parameter |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
mik-laj
commented
Aug 6, 2019
Travis is sad |
mik-laj
commented
Aug 12, 2019
Are you planning to continue working on this change? This week, I would like to deal with PR reviews related to GCP. I would be happy if you would respond to all comments |
benjamingrenier
commented
Aug 12, 2019
Yes I will work on this change soon, but I have some mistakes with my docker to run unit tests locally. |
benjamingrenier
commented
Aug 12, 2019
I ran unit tests locally and all succeed for tests.contrib.hooks.test_bigquery_hook.TestDatasetsOperations. |
benjamingrenier
commented
Aug 12, 2019
Sorry, I found my mistake. I append an array in array. I fixed it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What do you think about using the list_next method here? This will simplify the code.
Example:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/airflow/contrib/hooks/gcp_transfer_hook.py#L201-L206
mik-laj
commented
Aug 14, 2019
@benjamingrenier flake8 is sad ;_; |
ea7560e to
06dae40CompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
mik-laj
commented
Aug 28, 2019
Hi. I have prepared a commit for you. |
06dae40 to
e634388Comparebenjamingrenier
commented
Sep 2, 2019
Thanks it's done. |
e634388 to
e670a3eComparemik-laj
commented
Sep 5, 2019
Hi. I made a change in the base class - GoogleCloudBaseHook. Your PR may need to be changed. Could you do rebase? Cheers Reference: |
benjamingrenier
commented
Sep 5, 2019
Ok I will do that. |
e670a3e to
14d8e21Comparebenjamingrenier
commented
Sep 5, 2019
What rebase do you excepted ? On airflow/master ? |
mik-laj
commented
Sep 5, 2019
Yes. Please do rebase on latest apache/master. |
benjamingrenier
commented
Sep 6, 2019
Thanks, but how do you proceed to make that properly ? |
potiuk
commented
Sep 6, 2019
See CONTRIBUTING guide: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-guidelines - it has the link explaining how to rebase. |
potiuk
commented
Sep 6, 2019
Sam here @benjamingrenier -> we want to play nice and move the operators only after we merge outstanding requests so it would be great if you can rebase this PR on top of apache/master. |
4efff72 to
91d0857Compare4192043 to
a8471aaComparebenjamingrenier
commented
Sep 7, 2019
via email
I done the rebase on airflow/master such as you expect no?
Le sam. 7 sept. 2019 à 17:31, Jarek Potiuk <notifications@github.com> a
écrit : … ***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request.
Will approve after rebase.
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5565?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMS27S4J2NDMKZPQOAMSUPDQIPCOLA5CNFSM4IBV3MLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOCD7XFOI#pullrequestreview-285176505>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMS27SYSEDSP3XN5TVDQKOLQIPCOLANCNFSM4IBV3MLA>
.
|
potiuk
commented
Sep 21, 2019
Same here @benjamingrenier :(. Rebase is needed. |
a8471aa to
2146e77Comparebenjamingrenier
commented
Sep 22, 2019
Rebase done, but I don't understand why there are errors ? |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
OmerJog
commented
Nov 27, 2019
@potiuk wasn't this mergable? the failed test was just a timeout. |
OmerJog
commented
Dec 10, 2019
@benjamingrenier did you stop working on this PR ? seems like it was marked stale by mistake |
benjamingrenier
commented
Dec 10, 2019
via email
Yes it was a mistake I will rebases it soon.
Le mar. 10 déc. 2019 à 08:32, OmerJog <notifications@github.com> a écrit : …@benjamingrenier <https://github.com/benjamingrenier> did you stop
working on this PR ? seems like it was marked stale by mistake
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5565?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMS27SZWNXIOXDNX5GW3Z6DQX5AZ5A5CNFSM4IBV3MLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGOIBVA#issuecomment-563904724>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMS27S75U32WX4CP6A4VDD3QX5AZ5ANCNFSM4IBV3MLA>
.
|
benjamingrenier
commented
Dec 10, 2019
Done : #6780 |
Next page token used and max results parameter too. The method
get_datasets_listcan return more than 50 datasets.