Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Upgrade to SQLA 2 - #58049
Closed
vincbeck wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
vincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
from
November 7, 2025 23:57
3b5be06 to
061e27eComparevincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
from
November 24, 2025 16:25
061e27e to
4457c9bComparevincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
4 times, most recently
from
November 27, 2025 15:01
8ccc233 to
3bd3b95Comparepotiuk
commented
Nov 28, 2025
Member
Very close. |
vincbeck
commented
Nov 28, 2025
ContributorAuthor
Yep. This is the last PR: #58728 |
vincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 1, 2025 15:00
09b50f8 to
cff8c22Comparevincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
from
December 1, 2025 16:58
cff8c22 to
dab57d6Comparevincbeck
marked this pull request as ready for review
December 1, 2025 17:38
vincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 5, 2025 19:10
4b90847 to
2e3039aComparevincbeck
requested review from
amoghrajesh, ashb, gopidesupavan and potiuk
as code ownersDecember 5, 2025 19:10
vincbeck
requested review from
bugraoz93, jason810496, jscheffl and kaxil
as code ownersDecember 5, 2025 19:10
vincbeck
marked this pull request as draft
December 5, 2025 19:10
vincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 8, 2025 14:50
f3b650f to
17dec44Comparevincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
from
December 8, 2025 20:30
17dec44 to
f3cc8f8Comparevincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
4 times, most recently
from
December 16, 2025 17:53
1470b51 to
532fe05Comparevincbeckforce-pushed
the
vincbeck/fab_remove_sqla_limit
branch
from
December 22, 2025 21:23
532fe05 to
09bb7aeComparevincbeck
commented
Jan 5, 2026
ContributorAuthor
Completed by #59218 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In favor of #56212. Same change but the branch is in the airflow repo so that anybody can update it.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.