Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time by henry3260 · Pull Request #63247 · apache/airflow

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

henry3260 · 2026-03-10T08:55:06Z

Why

When a task resumes from a deferred state, the /execution/task-instances/{id}/run endpoint currently fails to include the original start_date in the returned context. This causes the Task SDK to receive incomplete or incorrect time information, which impacts the consistency of execution time semantics (i.e., the start_date should always reflect the task's initial start time, not the time it resumed).

What

Updated SQLAlchemy Query: Added TI.start_date to the select statement in ti_run to ensure the original task start time is properly fetched from the database.
Populated TIRunContext: Explicitly mapped context.start_date = ti.start_date in the TIRunContext response during the resume scenario (when next_method is present).
Preserved DB Behavior: Ensured that the existing logic remains intact—the TI.start_date in the database is strictly preserved and not overwritten when a task resumes.

closes: #63240

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Yes (please specify the tool below)

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Fixes inaccurate context["ti"].start_date for deferred task instances by propagating the original TI start time from the Execution API to the Task SDK supervisor so resumed-from-deferral runs don’t appear to “start” at resume time.

Changes:

Extend TIRunContext (Execution API + Task SDK generated models) with an optional start_date.
Populate TIRunContext.start_date from the Execution API when resuming from deferral.
Teach the Task SDK supervisor to prefer ti_context.start_date over datetime.now() when provided.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py`	Uses `ti_context.start_date` (when present) as the startup start time sent to the child process.
`task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/api/datamodels/_generated.py`	Adds `start_date` to the generated `TIRunContext` model.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/routes/task_instances.py`	Adds `start_date` to the `ti_run` response context when resuming from deferral.
`airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/execution_api/datamodels/taskinstance.py`	Documents and exposes `start_date` on the server-side `TIRunContext` model.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:23:09Z

LGTM!Thanks for your work.

arnoldmr01 · 2026-03-19T07:32:54Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?

Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

henry3260 · 2026-03-28T05:54:59Z

Would it make sense to add a test here to verify that StartupDetails.model_construct uses ti_context.start_date as start_date?
Just a personal thought. I'm not sure if it is necessary

Thanks for your review! I will add a test case for this

jason810496

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

…art time

henry3260 · 2026-03-31T17:47:55Z

Nice! The patch make sense to me overall.

Thanks for the review, Jason! I've addressed all the comments.

jason810496

Thanks for the update, left a final nit before we merge.

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

… original start time (apache#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

… original start time (#63247) (#65491) * [v3-2-test] Bump actions/github-script in the github-actions-updates group (#65150) (#65160) Bumps the github-actions-updates group with 1 update: [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script). Updates `actions/github-script` from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/github-script/releases) - [Commits](actions/github-script@ed59741...3a2844b) (cherry picked from commit e5a047c) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/github-script dependency-version: 9.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major dependency-group: github-actions-updates ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Added breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl (#65042) (#65241) * Add breeze generate issue content for airflow-ctl * add new command to doc (cherry picked from commit b24538b) Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> * [v3-2-test] Run release calendar verification on its own schedule (#65118) (#65242) * Move release calendar verification to its own scheduled workflow Run dev/verify_release_calendar.py from a dedicated daily scheduled workflow instead of as a canary job in the main CI pipeline, and notify the #release-management Slack channel when the check fails so the issue is surfaced to release managers directly. * Include wiki and calendar links in release calendar Slack alert (cherry picked from commit 048e9a1) * [v3-2-test] Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time (#63247) * Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original start time * Add API migration * Add unit test * add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior (cherry picked from commit a90202d) Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com> Co-authored-by: Justin Pakzad <114518232+justinpakzad@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Henry Chen <henryhenry0512@gmail.com>

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

boring-cyborgBot added the area:task-sdk label Mar 10, 2026

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2026 05:00

henry3260 requested review from amoghrajesh, ashb and kaxil as code owners March 11, 2026 05:00

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 11, 2026 05:00

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of henry3260 March 11, 2026 05:00 View session

CopilotAI reviewed Mar 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

henry3260 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2026 05:30

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch 4 times, most recently from 3be3946 to 2e458c5Compare March 16, 2026 01:39

henry3260 marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 03:04

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 2e458c5 to 6611e25Compare March 16, 2026 03:05

jason810496 reviewed Mar 31, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/supervisor.py Outdated
Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from 1ffebc5 to cdee639Compare March 31, 2026 09:56

henry3260 added 3 commits March 31, 2026 22:32

Fix ti.start_date showing deferral-resume time instead of original st…
82cc9d3
…art time

Add API migration
12569a5

Add unit test
8fa7aa0

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from cdee639 to 8fa7aa0Compare March 31, 2026 14:32

henry3260 requested a review from jason810496 April 2, 2026 10:37

potiuk added the ready for maintainer review Set after triaging when all criteria pass. label Apr 6, 2026

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 8, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadtask-sdk/tests/task_sdk/execution_time/test_supervisor.py Outdated

kaxil requested a review from Copilot April 10, 2026 19:55

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 10, 2026

add unit test to verify the resume start date behavior
cccf0b5

henry3260 force-pushed the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch from b09f837 to cccf0b5Compare April 14, 2026 10:38

jason810496 approved these changes Apr 19, 2026
View reviewed changes

jason810496 added this to the Airflow 3.2.2 milestone Apr 19, 2026

jason810496 merged commit a90202d into apache:mainApr 19, 2026
141 checks passed

henry3260 deleted the fix-start-date-is-inaccurate-from-context branch April 20, 2026 02:53

Uh oh!

Conversation

henry3260 commented Mar 10, 2026• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Why

What

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Uh oh!

CopilotAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

arnoldmr01 commented Mar 19, 2026

Uh oh!

arnoldmr01 commented Mar 19, 2026

Uh oh!

henry3260 commented Mar 28, 2026

Uh oh!

jason810496 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

henry3260 commented Mar 31, 2026

Uh oh!

jason810496 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CopilotAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

henry3260 commented Mar 10, 2026• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Why

What

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

Uh oh!

CopilotAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

arnoldmr01 commented Mar 19, 2026

Uh oh!

arnoldmr01 commented Mar 19, 2026

Uh oh!

henry3260 commented Mar 28, 2026

Uh oh!

jason810496 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

henry3260 commented Mar 31, 2026

Uh oh!

jason810496 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

henry3260 commented Mar 10, 2026•
edited
Loading

henry3260 commented Mar 10, 2026•
edited
Loading

henry3260 commented Mar 10, 2026•
edited
Loading