[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447) - #64495

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Fix newsfragment check being cancelled on rapid PR events (#64447)#64495
potiuk merged 1 commit into
v3-2-testfrom
backport-7e29628-v3-2-test

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…#64447)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@potiuk
potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2026 11:40
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit ad55bc4 into v3-2-testApr 1, 2026
5 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the backport-7e29628-v3-2-test branch April 1, 2026 11:40
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…#64447) (#64495)
Change cancel-in-progress from true to false so that concurrent
runs queue instead of cancelling each other. This check is very
lightweight (single API call) so queueing has no downside, and
avoids spurious "Cancelled" status on PRs that receive multiple
events in quick succession (e.g. push + label change).
(cherry picked from commit 7e29628)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@potiuk