Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests by potiuk · Pull Request #69626 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests - #69626

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Run CI on chart and airflow-ctl release-branch pull requests#69626
potiuk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches

Conversation

@potiuk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PRs targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable release branches received no CI at all — those branch patterns were missing from the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm, and codeql-analysis, so only branch-independent bot checks (Mergeable/WIP) reported and a PR could show all-green without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL running (e.g. #69579 against chart/v1-2x-test).

This adds the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers. The sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated in the same PR so the amd/arm guard keeps passing; push triggers get the -test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Opus 4.8)

Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines

Pull requests targeting the chart/v*-test|stable and airflow-ctl/v*-test|stable
release branches received no CI at all: those branch patterns were missing from
the pull_request/push branch filters of ci-amd, ci-arm and codeql-analysis, so
only branch-independent bot checks reported and a PR could show all-green
without any tests, static checks, or CodeQL ever running.
Add the chart and airflow-ctl release-branch patterns to those triggers (the
sync-enforced AMD-only trigger block in check_ci_workflows_in_sync.py is updated
in the same change so the amd/arm guard keeps passing). push triggers get the
-test variants only, matching the existing release-prep push convention.
@potiuk
potiukforce-pushed the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch from c704f36 to eb97efdCompareJuly 8, 2026 17:10
@potiuk
potiuk merged commit 6d155bb into mainJul 8, 2026
145 of 156 checks passed
@potiuk
potiuk deleted the fix-ci-triggers-chart-airflowctl-branches branch July 8, 2026 17:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport failed to create: v3-3-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

StatusBranchResult
v3-3-testCommit Link

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker 6d155bb v3-3-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-3-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Lee-W added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
Pull requests targeting this branch received no CI at all: the
airflow-ctl release-branch patterns were missing from the workflow
trigger filters, so only branch-independent bot checks reported and a
PR could show all-green without any tests or CodeQL ever running.
GitHub resolves trigger filters from the workflow files on the target
branch, so the equivalent fix on main (apache#69626) does not apply here and
has to land on the release branch itself.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@potiuk@kaxil@gopidesupavan