Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):

  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.

Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496 approved these changes Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 5984acd into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels branch August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec - #71094
Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Aug 5, 2026
Merged
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec#71094
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom 
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels
Conversation
@Lee-W
@Lee-WLee-W
commented
Aug 4, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
The test-to-stable sync (#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core 3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here (#70724):
  • generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from ../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so Static checks could never pass
  • the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses #64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required

This runs the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this branch. It drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add is_backfillable property to DAG API responses (#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but #64644 touches only airflow-core — that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  •  Yes — Claude Opus 5
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines
@Lee-W
Regenerate airflowctl datamodels from this branch's API spec
186b1aa
The test-to-stable sync (apache#67294) copied airflowctl's generated datamodels
from main, so they describe Airflow 3.3's API while this branch ships core
3.2.1. Two consequences, both red once CI started running here:
- generate-airflowctl-datamodels regenerates from
../airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi and fails on any drift, so
Static checks could never pass
- the models required is_backfillable and timetable_periodic, which
apache#64644 added in 3.3.0, so every single-object Dag response failed
validation against this branch's own PROD image:
ValidationError: 2 validation errors for DAGResponse
is_backfillable Field required
timetable_periodic Field required
Run the hook to bring the models back in line with the spec on this
branch. This drops 14 model classes that no airflowctl code or test
references, plus the 3.3-only fields above.
Note RELEASE_NOTES.rst credits "Add ``is_backfillable`` property to DAG
API responses (apache#64644)" to airflowctl 0.1.5, but apache#64644 touches only
airflow-core -- that line is sync noise, not a client feature.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 08:45
jason810496
jason810496
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
@jason810496jason810496
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.
@Lee-W
Lee-W
merged commit 5984acd
into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 5, 2026

2 checks passed

@Lee-W
Lee-W
deleted the

ctl-v0-1-regenerate-datamodels

branch
August 5, 2026 09:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jason810496jason810496jason810496 approved these changes
@bugraoz93bugraoz93Awaiting requested review from bugraoz93bugraoz93 is a code owner
@potiukpotiukAwaiting requested review from potiukpotiuk is a code owner
@dheerajturagadheerajturagaAwaiting requested review from dheerajturagadheerajturaga is a code owner

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area:airflow-ctl

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496