Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions by Lee-W · Pull Request #71097 · apache/airflow · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions - #71097

Merged
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

Fix airflow-ctl 0.1 branch image build by realigning core versions#71097
Lee-W merged 1 commit into
apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testfrom
astronomer:ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions

Conversation

@Lee-W

@Lee-WLee-W commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (#67294) copied main's airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:

  • the distribution version became 3.3.0 while airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
  • the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this branch is 1.2.1
  • a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here

Once CI actually started running on this branch (#70724), the CI image build failed pip check on the resulting triangle:

apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0

This realigns the metadata with the sources that are on the branch — which is what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage already expect — and refreshes uv.lock, which had drifted from the same sync.

Split out of #70724 so that PR stays workflow-only.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Opus 5

Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 following the guidelines

@Lee-W
Lee-W marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 08:44

@jason810496jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bugraoz93 would you like to take a final look before merge?

The "airflow-ctl 0.1.5: test to stable" sync (apache#67294) copied main's
airflow-core/pyproject.toml metadata onto this branch without the
matching sources. Three leftovers stayed behind:
- the distribution version became 3.3.0 while
airflow-core/src/airflow/__init__.py stayed 3.2.1
- the Task SDK requirement became >=1.3.0,<1.4.0 while task-sdk on this
branch is 1.2.1
- a force-include and a shared_distributions entry appeared for
apache-airflow-shared-state, which has no shared/state folder here
Once CI actually started running on this branch, the CI image build
failed pip check on the resulting triangle:
apache-airflow 3.2.1 has requirement apache-airflow-core==3.2.1,
but you have apache-airflow-core 3.3.0
apache-airflow-core 3.3.0 has requirement
apache-airflow-task-sdk<1.4.0,>=1.3.0, but you have 1.2.1
apache-airflow-task-sdk 1.2.1 has requirement
apache-airflow-core<3.3.0,>=3.2.0, but you have 3.3.0
Realign the metadata with the sources that are on the branch, which is
what check-version-consistency and check-shared-distributions-usage
already expect, and refresh uv.lock, which had drifted from the same
sync.
@Lee-W
Lee-Wforce-pushed the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch from c9e59ba to bf7f161CompareAugust 5, 2026 12:27
@Lee-W

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

since this add a mypy improvement to a branch we didn't enable, I'll go ahead and merge it and see how it works

@Lee-W
Lee-W merged commit 0d115c7 into apache:airflow-ctl/v0-1-testAug 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@Lee-W
Lee-W deleted the ctl-v0-1-fix-image-build-core-versions branch August 12, 2026 12:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lee-W@jason810496