Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Upgrade to object_store 0.13.0 - #9017
Closed
alamb wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
Conversation
7 tasks
alamb
marked this pull request as draft
December 18, 2025 20:58
This was referenced Dec 18, 2025
alambforce-pushed
the
alamb/upgrade_object_store
branch
from
January 9, 2026 21:33
9f64ca0 to
c5d4c5eComparealamb
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2026 13:50
Jefffrey
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2026
Jefffrey
commented
Jan 28, 2026
Contributor
Superseded by #9256 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
0.13.0(breaking) - Target Nov 2025 arrow-rs-object-store#367Rationale for this change
Update to latest object store crate
(I made this PR early as a way to test the upgrade)
What changes are included in this PR?
ObjectStoreExt)Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?