Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845
ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
Thanks for opening a pull request! If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project. Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format? or See also: |
westonpace
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
wjones127
commented
Apr 18, 2022
It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures: |
westonpace
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for taking care of this.
ursabot
commented
Apr 23, 2022
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes. |
In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using
use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.
As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the
local_states_capacity.