Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues by wjones127 · Pull Request #12845 · apache/arrow · GitHub
Skip to content

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues - #12845

Closed
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets
Closed

ARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issues#12845
wjones127 wants to merge 6 commits into
apache:masterfrom
wjones127:ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets

Conversation

@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #12339 we added one, which enabled joining one table to one dataset using use_threads=false. However, I found that joining two datasets hit the thread limit.

There are plans to find a long-term fix that can run these operations synchronously with fewer threads, but that won't be ready for the next release.

As a temporary fix for 8.0.0, I propose just bumping up the local_states_ capacity.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wjones127wjones127 changed the title [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesARROW-15718: [C++] Increase thread limit to work around thread issuesApr 8, 2022
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for realizing we still needed to patch this up. This looks good to me but I think we can be just a touch safer (the cost of allocating these extra states should be insignificant).

Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
Comment threadcpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/hash_join.cc Outdated
@wjones127
wjones127 marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2022 22:33
@wjones127

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It looks like that Java failure is simply flaky right now. See other recent failures:

@westonpacewestonpace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking care of this.

@wjones127
wjones127 deleted the ARROW-15718-multiple-datasets branch April 21, 2022 14:41
@ursabot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1763622 and contender = 08ab8b0. 08ab8b0 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Finished ⬇️0.0% ⬆️0.0%] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed ⬇️0.75% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-i9-9960x
[Finished ⬇️0.67% ⬆️0.0%] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/566|08ab8b0f ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/554|08ab8b0f test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/552|08ab8b0f ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/564|08ab8b0f ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2/builds/565|1763622b ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-test-mac-arm/builds/553|1763622b test-mac-arm>
[Failed] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-i9-9960x/builds/551|1763622b ursa-i9-9960x>
[Finished] <https://buildkite.com/apache-arrow/arrow-bci-benchmark-on-ursa-thinkcentre-m75q/builds/563|1763622b ursa-thinkcentre-m75q>
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wjones127@ursabot@westonpace