Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
GH-35728: [CI][Python] Move test_total_bytes_allocated to a subprocess to improve reliability - #36355
Conversation
…process to improve reliability
raulcd
commented
Jun 28, 2023
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-manylinux-* |
Revision: 0806a80 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-020f7043d9 |
raulcd
commented
Jun 28, 2023
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-manylinux-2014-*-arm64 |
Revision: 4d3d57e Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-8d319d3cbd
|
raulcd
commented
Jun 28, 2023
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-manylinux-2014-cp310-arm64 |
Revision: 4d3d57e Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-5976a03430
|
raulcd
commented
Jun 28, 2023
the flaky failures seem unrelated to this test now but to s3 |
pitrou
commented
Jun 28, 2023
@github-actions crossbow submit -g python |
Revision: 4d3d57e Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-b168c1dadc |
raulcd
commented
Jun 29, 2023
@pitrou are you ok merging this? All the failures are known unrelated nightly failures |
pitrou
commented
Jun 29, 2023
@raulcd Yes, please merge! |
Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmark runs on commit There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
The full Conbench report has more details. |
Rationale for this change
Currently some conda and wheels jobs are failing due to this error:
What changes are included in this PR?
As suggested on the issue trying to move this test to a subprocess to see if it improves reliabilit.
Are these changes tested?
Archery and CI
Are there any user-facing changes?
No
test_total_bytes_allocatedfailing on CI #35728