GH-36323: [Python] Fix Timestamp scalar repr error on values outside datetime range

[aboss123]

Rationale for this change

#36323

What changes are included in this PR?

Changed the way repr is handled for TimestampScalar

Are these changes tested?

I have added a very basic test for this change to see whether it will error or not if outside the range.

Are there any user-facing changes?

The functionality of TimestampScalar's repr now uses the strftime function.

• Closes: [Python] Repr of Timestamp scalars error if they are outside range of stdlib datetime.datetime #36323

[kou]

@github-actions crossbow submit -g python

[github-actions]

Revision: 8e6def2

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-6d5645c1ef

Task	Status
test-conda-python-3.10
test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-2.9.2
test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-3.2.1
test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-latest
test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-nightly
test-conda-python-3.10-spark-master
test-conda-python-3.10-substrait
test-conda-python-3.11
test-conda-python-3.11-dask-latest
test-conda-python-3.11-dask-upstream_devel
test-conda-python-3.11-hypothesis
test-conda-python-3.11-pandas-upstream_devel
test-conda-python-3.8
test-conda-python-3.8-pandas-1.0
test-conda-python-3.8-spark-v3.1.2
test-conda-python-3.9
test-conda-python-3.9-pandas-latest
test-conda-python-3.9-spark-v3.2.0
test-cuda-python
test-debian-11-python-3
test-fedora-35-python-3
test-ubuntu-20.04-python-3
test-ubuntu-22.04-python-3

[aboss123]

Will there need to be anything else I need to change, or is everything all set?

[kou]

+1

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 112f949.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.