GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation - #36977

Merged
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

GH-36240: [Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation#36977
AlenkaF merged 21 commits into
apache:mainfrom
R-JunmingChen:ARROW-36240

Conversation

@R-JunmingChen

@R-JunmingChenR-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rationale for this change
As #36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the test_option_class_equality in test_compute.py (Error example). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
image

Are there any user-facing changes?
No.

Closes: #36240

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:51
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:10
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 15:31
@R-JunmingChen

R-JunmingChen commented Aug 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hi, reviewers,here are two choices to handle the problem the PR can't pass test_option_class_equality. Do you have any ideas about it?

  1. We ignore it, this unequality seems to have no impact on usage for users.
  2. We also make CumulativeSumOptions an independent class in C++.

@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2023 15:56

@danepitkindanepitkin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the failing test, we can just add an explicit check for CumulativeSumOptions == CumulativeOptions. We can add a TODO comment to remove the check when the deprecated class is removed.

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx Outdated
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Aug 1, 2023
@R-JunmingChen
R-JunmingChen marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2023 00:47
Comment threadpython/pyarrow/_compute.pyx
@danepitkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One suggestion, otherwise LGTM! Nice work! I'll add an Arrow committer to the reviewer's list.

Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>

@AlenkaFAlenkaF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

Just a small nitpick suggestion for clearer understanding of the TODO, then I will merge 👍

Comment threadpython/pyarrow/tests/test_compute.py Outdated
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
@AlenkaF

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fe750ed.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2023
…eSumOptions refactor (#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of #36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: #37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…class for independent deprecation (apache#36977)
**Rationale for this change**
As apache#36240 says, we refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class.
**What changes are included in this PR?**
- independent CumulativeSumOptions - the original simple test before apache#32190 - fix a typo in CumulativeOptions **Are these changes tested?**
No.
Actually, the PR can't pass the `test_option_class_equality` in test_compute.py ([Error example](https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5728571658/job/15523443371?pr=36977)). Cause CumulativeSumOptions's C++ part is also CumulativeOptions.
![image](https://github.com/apache/arrow/assets/18380073/0a173684-47f8-4eb9-b8f4-ba72aa5aab97)
**Are there any user-facing changes?**
No.
Closes: apache#36240
* Closes: apache#36240
Lead-authored-by: Junming Chen <junming.chen.r@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Dane Pitkin <48041712+danepitkin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ulativeSumOptions refactor (apache#37305)
### Rationale for this change
Merging of apache#36977 caused a CI failure due to a test giving a warning.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Add a `filterwarnings` mark to the failing tests. This also tests the deprecation message.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* Closes: apache#37303
Authored-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Python] Refactor CumulativeSumOptions to a separate class for independent deprecation

3 participants

@R-JunmingChen@danepitkin@AlenkaF