Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
GH-41353: [C++] Define bit_width and byte_width of ExtensionType in terms of the storage type - #41354
Merged
Merged
Conversation
mapleFU
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2024
Member
Does this work ok for non-fixed width storage types? |
ContributorAuthor
They will continue to return And I didn't make them final, so if a |
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 7 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit fb7e468. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 26 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
zanmato1984 pushed a commit
to zanmato1984/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
…e in terms of the storage type (apache#41354) ### Rationale for this change Users and other classes within Arrow itself (e.g. array builders) expect extension types to behave like their underlying storage type. As it is now, `ExtensionType::bit_width()` is the default `DataType::bit_width()` implementation which returns `-1`. It should return the storage type's bit-width. ### What changes are included in this PR? Definition of `ExtensionType::bit_width/byte_width` functions. ### Are these changes tested? Tests added and confirmed to fail prior to these changes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? `ExtensionType` now define `bit_width` and `byte_width` according to their storage type. * GitHub Issue: apache#41353 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com>
raulcd pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
…erms of the storage type (#41354) ### Rationale for this change Users and other classes within Arrow itself (e.g. array builders) expect extension types to behave like their underlying storage type. As it is now, `ExtensionType::bit_width()` is the default `DataType::bit_width()` implementation which returns `-1`. It should return the storage type's bit-width. ### What changes are included in this PR? Definition of `ExtensionType::bit_width/byte_width` functions. ### Are these changes tested? Tests added and confirmed to fail prior to these changes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? `ExtensionType` now define `bit_width` and `byte_width` according to their storage type. * GitHub Issue: #41353 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com>
vibhatha pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2024
…e in terms of the storage type (apache#41354) ### Rationale for this change Users and other classes within Arrow itself (e.g. array builders) expect extension types to behave like their underlying storage type. As it is now, `ExtensionType::bit_width()` is the default `DataType::bit_width()` implementation which returns `-1`. It should return the storage type's bit-width. ### What changes are included in this PR? Definition of `ExtensionType::bit_width/byte_width` functions. ### Are these changes tested? Tests added and confirmed to fail prior to these changes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? `ExtensionType` now define `bit_width` and `byte_width` according to their storage type. * GitHub Issue: apache#41353 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Users and other classes within Arrow itself (e.g. array builders) expect extension types to behave like their underlying storage type.
As it is now,
ExtensionType::bit_width()is the defaultDataType::bit_width()implementation which returns-1. It should return the storage type's bit-width.What changes are included in this PR?
Definition of
ExtensionType::bit_width/byte_widthfunctions.Are these changes tested?
Tests added and confirmed to fail prior to these changes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
ExtensionTypenow definebit_widthandbyte_widthaccording to their storage type.