GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points - #43173

Merged
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

GH-43044: [R] So-called non-API entry points#43173
jonkeane merged 4 commits into
apache:mainfrom
jonkeane:non_api

Conversation

@jonkeane

@jonkeanejonkeane commented Jul 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

CRAN

What changes are included in this PR?

Remove so-called non-api calls

Are these changes tested?

With tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

Hopefully not

This PR contains a "Critical Fix".

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43044has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@nealrichardsonnealrichardson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Comment threadr/src/arrow_cpp11.h Outdated
Comment on lines 44 to 45
#define UTF8_MASK (1 << 3)
#define ASCII_MASK (1 << 6)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can delete these too, they were only used by the macros you removed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah right of course

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is ok, just one suggestion for something else to remove. AFAICT we only call r_string_size on a STRING_ELT from a STRSXP, and similarly for utf8_string/utf8_strings. Rf_translateCharUTF8 should always work on those inputs.

Here's the R internals version of IS_ASCII etc.; LEVELS is defined as sxpinfo.gp, an opaque bitmask. Even if this change turns out not to be correct, I don't think we want to be touching sxpinfo.gp for anything ourselves. https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/0ebd0b0b574847597ac19fbf0bbbf31e3197e84b/src/include/Defn.h#L832-L853

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ah great, you've found the line in the scriptures to confirm that #43044 (comment)

It took many nights of studying the holy text

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 7, 2024
@jonkeane
jonkeane merged commit ca49843 into apache:mainJul 7, 2024
@jonkeanejonkeane removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Jul 7, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ca49843.

There were 5 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

jonkeane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
### Rationale for this change
CRAN ### What changes are included in this PR?
Remove so-called non-api calls
### Are these changes tested?
With tests
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Hopefully not
**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".**
* GitHub Issue: #43044
Authored-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Keane <jkeane@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonkeane@nealrichardson