GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package - #43468

Merged
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

GH-43467: [C++] Add support for the official LZ4 CMake package#43468
assignUser merged 3 commits into
apache:mainfrom
kou:cpp-lz4

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

LZ4 1.10.0 provides LZ4::lz4 but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only LZ4::lz4_shared and LZ4::lz4_static. So we need to prepare LZ4::lz4 in our side.

What changes are included in this PR?

Define LZ4::lz4 by LZ4::lz4_shared or LZ4::lz4_static if LZ4::lz4 doesn't exist.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only
`LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare
`LZ4::lz4` in our side.
@kou

kou commented Jul 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit -g linux

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #43467has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 3f3f175

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0c25fa4488

TaskStatus
almalinux-8-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-8-arm64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-amd64GitHub Actions
almalinux-9-arm64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-amd64GitHub Actions
amazon-linux-2023-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-7-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-8-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-amd64GitHub Actions
centos-9-stream-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@assignUser

assignUser commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

Because liblz4-dev misses it.
@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@github-actions crossbow submit debian-* ubuntu-*

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-162465cbc3

TaskStatus
r-binary-packagesGitHub Actions

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: c2c28c8

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-033c72d75e

TaskStatus
debian-bookworm-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-bookworm-arm64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-amd64GitHub Actions
debian-trixie-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-focal-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-jammy-arm64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-amd64GitHub Actions
ubuntu-noble-arm64GitHub Actions

@kou

kou commented Jul 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

+1

@jonkeane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for this! I've been attempting to replicate the CRAN issue locally and this look like it will work (though I haven't yet gotten a full success yet due to other unrelated AWS dependency issues. I'll cherry pick it to our maintenance branch there and test again tomorrow morning

jonkeane pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
### Rationale for this change
LZ4 1.10.0 provides `LZ4::lz4` but LZ4 1.9.4 provides only `LZ4::lz4_shared` and `LZ4::lz4_static`. So we need to prepare `LZ4::lz4` in our side.
### What changes are included in this PR?
Define `LZ4::lz4` by `LZ4::lz4_shared` or `LZ4::lz4_static` if `LZ4::lz4` doesn't exist.
### Are these changes tested?
Yes.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
* GitHub Issue: #43467
Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
@kou
kou deleted the cpp-lz4 branch July 31, 2024 05:38
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 62fd987.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 82 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@assignUser@jonkeane