GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA - #45500

Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

GH-45499: [CI] Bump actions/cache version on GHA#45500
pitrou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
pitrou:gh45499-actions-cache

Conversation

@pitrou

@pitroupitrou commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

Older versions of the actions/cache GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918

Are these changes tested?

Yes, by construction.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #45499has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@NickCrews

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good to me!

@raulcdraulcd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ASF states that pinning is a requirement for third party actions not on apache/*, github/* or actions/*:
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
So this one is not strictly required to be pinned.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou merged commit 13940cd into apache:mainFeb 11, 2025
@pitroupitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Feb 11, 2025
@pitrou
pitrou deleted the gh45499-actions-cache branch February 11, 2025 17:32
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 13940cd.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 21 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
### Rationale for this change
Older versions of the `actions/cache` GitHub action are being deprecated as explained in actions/cache#1510.
Because of this, some CI jobs have started to fail: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/13265539807/job/37034895918
### Are these changes tested?
Yes, by construction.
### Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
* GitHub Issue: #45499
Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pitrou@NickCrews@raulcd