Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ARROW-836: add test for pandas conversion of timedelta, currently unimplemented - #551
ARROW-836: add test for pandas conversion of timedelta, currently unimplemented#551jreback wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
jreback
commented
Apr 16, 2017
so looks like this type should be added. The impl should be almost exactly like |
wesm
commented
Apr 16, 2017
Agreed -- we have a SQL-compliant "interval" type (https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/format/Schema.fbs#L143), but no absolute timedelta. The implementation would be the same as Time (https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/format/Schema.fbs#L106), though perhaps we can relax the storage constraint and use 64 bits for everything. Would you mind opening a JIRA and prefixing the PR title with ARROW-XXX:? thanks @jreback ! |
jreback
commented
Apr 16, 2017
yes I think the current definition of |
jreback
commented
Apr 16, 2017
wesm
commented
Apr 16, 2017
Cool, as a bookkeeping matter can you also make a JIRA for this patch and update the PR title? https://github.com/apache/arrow#how-to-contribute |
jreback
commented
Apr 16, 2017
…mplemented xref pandas-dev/pandas#16004 Author: Jeff Reback <jeff.reback@twosigma.com> Closesapache#551 from jreback/timedelta and squashes the following commits: cfd310e [Jeff Reback] TST: add test for pandas conversion of timedelta, currently unimplemented
xref pandas-dev/pandas#16004