ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor - #560

Closed
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor
Closed

ARROW-846: [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor#560
kou wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kou:glib-add-tensor

Conversation

@kou

@koukou commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As a way to reduce build times, have you considered consolidating code either by object type (all types / arrays / tensors in one place) or data type (e.g. all the uint8 things in one header)? One of the downsides of C++, I guess. It's not a problem either way

@kou

kou commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

OK. I'll choose object type based consolidation. Because it's suitable for organizing documentation.

Arrow GLib uses one class per file because documentation tool Arrow GLib uses (GTK-Doc) uses one document section per file rule.

Should I do the change in this pull request? Or can I work on the change as another pull request? I want to work on the change as another pull request to do one thing in one pull request.

GObject Introspection on Ubuntu 14.04 is 1.40. It doesn't support
"(nullable)". "(nullable)" was added since 1.42.
@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou I see about GTK-Doc, I did not know that requirement. I will defer to your judgment; if you make any changes it's OK to do them in another pull request.

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

So one thing I'm wondering, and want your opinion. I am not sure if having all of the TYPENAME##Tensor classes is very useful, since they only provide a typed data pointer. We would make only a single Tensor class instead, would that make things easier for you?

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @robertnishihara@pcmoritz -- I am considering removing the arrow::Tensor subclasses, but I want to see if you anticipate that causing any problems. I'm going to merge this PR for now

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou
kou deleted the glib-add-tensor branch April 19, 2017 23:09
@kou

kou commented Apr 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's OK to me that Tensor subclasses are removed.
If Tensor class provides a method that returns one element value like Array::GetValue(), Tensor subclasses are useful. But the current Tensor class doesn't provide it.

@pcmoritz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wesm I don't think we need the tensor subclasses, so ARROW-860 is perfectly fine. If people in the future want to write C++ application code to modify typed tensors we can reconsider.

@wesm

wesm commented Apr 22, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK. Sounds ogod

jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…ensor
Author: Kouhei Sutou <kou@clear-code.com>
Closesapache#560 from kou/glib-add-tensor and squashes the following commits:
ed949d4 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Support running tests on Ubuntu 14.04
39d40f0 [Kouhei Sutou] [GLib] Add GArrowTensor, GArrowInt8Tensor and GArrowUInt8Tensor
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kou@wesm@pcmoritz