ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases - #7769

Closed
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog
Closed

ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releases#7769
kszucs wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
kszucs:changelog

Conversation

@kszucs

@kszucskszucs commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Generated by the following command from #7162

archery release --jira-cache /tmp/archery-cache changelog regenerate

Here is the new rendered CHANGELOG.md

We may want to run the new curation script as well to update the jira fix versions for the issues resolved right after the release cuts (then regenerate the changelog again).

We can also improve the script to organize the changelog around components in the future since that information is already available in #7162

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kszucs
kszucsforce-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from 13afe2c to 964a9adCompareJuly 15, 2020 11:23
@wesmwesm changed the title [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesJul 15, 2020
@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Based on what I can tell people aren't consistent about classifying things as Improvements vs. New Features (and sometimes the distinction is unclear), so I feel like those categories should be grouped together. Thoughts?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I agree that the only consistent distinction we use is bug vs. not bug. And even if we had a meaningful distinction between new feature and improvement, I'm not sure a reader of the changelog would know what that was or even care.

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

So we shouldn't add a label for the improvements nor the new features, just for the bug fixes?

@nealrichardson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would just say everything that is not a Bug goes under "New Features"

@wesm

wesm commented Jul 15, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"New Features and Improvements" as the header would be good

@kszucs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Ok, updating.

@kszucskszucs changed the title ARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md including patch releasesARROW-8521: [Release] Update CHANGELOG.md to include patch releasesJul 15, 2020

@wesmwesm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kszucs@wesm@nealrichardson