Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ARROW-10235: [Rust][DataFusion] Improve documentation for type coercion - #8399
Closed
alamb wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
ARROW-10235: [Rust][DataFusion] Improve documentation for type coercion#8399alamb wants to merge 1 commit into
alamb wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
alambforce-pushed
the
alamb/coercion-docs
branch
from
October 8, 2020 12:27
63f7114 to
9f497c6Comparejorgecarleitao
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2020
jorgecarleitao
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot @alamb! Looks great. Thanks a lot for taking this.
I left two minor suggestions.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced Oct 8, 2020
nevi-me pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2020
…ataFusion This is a PR incorporating the feedback from @nevi-me and @jorgecarleitao from #8400 It adds 1. a `can_cast_types` function to the Arrow cast kernel (as suggested by @jorgecarleitao / @nevi-me in #8400 (comment)) that encodes the valid type casting 2. A test that ensures `can_cast_types` and `cast` remain in sync 3. Bug fixes that the test above uncovered (I'll comment inline) 4. Change DataFuson to use `can_cast_types` so that it plans casting consistently with what arrow allows Previously the notions of coercion and casting were somewhat conflated in DataFusion. I have tried to clarify them in #8399 and this PR. See also #8340 (comment) for more discussion. I am adding this functionality so DataFusion gains rudimentary support `DictionaryArray`. Codewise, I am concerned about the duplication in logic between the match statements in `cast` and `can_cast_types. I have some thoughts on how to unify them (see #8400 (comment)), but I don't have time to implement that as it is a bigger change. I think this approach with some duplication is ok, and the test will ensure they remain in sync. Closes#8460 from alamb/alamb/ARROW-10236-casting-rules-2 Authored-by: alamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Neville Dipale <nevilledips@gmail.com>
kszucs pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2020
…ataFusion This is a PR incorporating the feedback from @nevi-me and @jorgecarleitao from #8400 It adds 1. a `can_cast_types` function to the Arrow cast kernel (as suggested by @jorgecarleitao / @nevi-me in #8400 (comment)) that encodes the valid type casting 2. A test that ensures `can_cast_types` and `cast` remain in sync 3. Bug fixes that the test above uncovered (I'll comment inline) 4. Change DataFuson to use `can_cast_types` so that it plans casting consistently with what arrow allows Previously the notions of coercion and casting were somewhat conflated in DataFusion. I have tried to clarify them in #8399 and this PR. See also #8340 (comment) for more discussion. I am adding this functionality so DataFusion gains rudimentary support `DictionaryArray`. Codewise, I am concerned about the duplication in logic between the match statements in `cast` and `can_cast_types. I have some thoughts on how to unify them (see #8400 (comment)), but I don't have time to implement that as it is a bigger change. I think this approach with some duplication is ok, and the test will ensure they remain in sync. Closes#8460 from alamb/alamb/ARROW-10236-casting-rules-2 Authored-by: alamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Neville Dipale <nevilledips@gmail.com>
alamb added a commit
to apache/arrow-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2021
…ataFusion This is a PR incorporating the feedback from @nevi-me and @jorgecarleitao from apache/arrow#8400 It adds 1. a `can_cast_types` function to the Arrow cast kernel (as suggested by @jorgecarleitao / @nevi-me in apache/arrow#8400 (comment)) that encodes the valid type casting 2. A test that ensures `can_cast_types` and `cast` remain in sync 3. Bug fixes that the test above uncovered (I'll comment inline) 4. Change DataFuson to use `can_cast_types` so that it plans casting consistently with what arrow allows Previously the notions of coercion and casting were somewhat conflated in DataFusion. I have tried to clarify them in apache/arrow#8399 and this PR. See also apache/arrow#8340 (comment) for more discussion. I am adding this functionality so DataFusion gains rudimentary support `DictionaryArray`. Codewise, I am concerned about the duplication in logic between the match statements in `cast` and `can_cast_types. I have some thoughts on how to unify them (see apache/arrow#8400 (comment)), but I don't have time to implement that as it is a bigger change. I think this approach with some duplication is ok, and the test will ensure they remain in sync. Closes#8460 from alamb/alamb/ARROW-10236-casting-rules-2 Authored-by: alamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: Neville Dipale <nevilledips@gmail.com>
This was referenced Oct 9, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The code / comments for type coercion are a little confusing and don't make the distinction between coercion and casting clear – this PR attempts to clarify the intent, channeling the information from @jorgecarleitao here: #8340 (comment)