Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ARROW-11717: [Integration] report debug logs for failing Flight case - #9583
Closed
lidavidm wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
ARROW-11717: [Integration] report debug logs for failing Flight case#9583lidavidm wants to merge 2 commits into
lidavidm wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
alamb
commented
Feb 26, 2021
Contributor
👍 thank you @lidavidm |
lidavidm
commented
Feb 26, 2021
MemberAuthor
The test stops failing once I add debug logging on the Rust side :/ But the C++ debug logs report that when it connects to the Rust server, the server resets the connection. |
lidavidm
commented
Feb 26, 2021
MemberAuthor
Actually, I think I see the issue now. The Rust service starts listening on the port in listen_on in flight_server_scenarios.rs, but the Flight server isn't set up until after that - so if the client connects in between, it'll get an error. Do you have to await the future from |
alamb
commented
Feb 27, 2021
Contributor
Thanks @lidavidm -- that sounds very plausible. I'll get a PR up with a proposed fix |
alamb
commented
Feb 27, 2021
Contributor
Proposed PR here: #9593 |
lidavidm pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2021
…es with rust # Background Thanks to the 🦅 👁️ of @lidavidm#9583 (comment) it appears that the Rust flight integration test prints `"Server listening"` before the server is *actually* read to accept connections. Thus creating a race condition: if the tests try and start faster than the rust server can actually be setup then we see integration test failures as shown in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11717: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/arrow/dev/archery/archery/integration/runner.py", line 308, in _run_flight_test_case consumer.flight_request(port, **client_args) File "/arrow/dev/archery/archery/integration/tester_cpp.py", line 116, in flight_request run_cmd(cmd) File "/arrow/dev/archery/archery/integration/util.py", line 148, in run_cmd raise RuntimeError(sio.getvalue()) RuntimeError: Command failed: /build/cpp/debug/flight-test-integration-client -host localhost -port=33569 -scenario auth:basic_proto With output: -------------- -- Arrow Fatal Error -- Invalid: Expected UNAUTHENTICATED but got Unavailable ``` # Changes This PR changes the Rust flight scenario harnesses to print the ready message after the server is *actually* ready. Closes#9593 from alamb/alamb/arrow-11717 Authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
alamb added a commit
to apache/arrow-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2021
…es with rust # Background Thanks to the 🦅 👁️ of @lidavidmapache/arrow#9583 (comment) it appears that the Rust flight integration test prints `"Server listening"` before the server is *actually* read to accept connections. Thus creating a race condition: if the tests try and start faster than the rust server can actually be setup then we see integration test failures as shown in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11717: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/arrow/dev/archery/archery/integration/runner.py", line 308, in _run_flight_test_case consumer.flight_request(port, **client_args) File "/arrow/dev/archery/archery/integration/tester_cpp.py", line 116, in flight_request run_cmd(cmd) File "/arrow/dev/archery/archery/integration/util.py", line 148, in run_cmd raise RuntimeError(sio.getvalue()) RuntimeError: Command failed: /build/cpp/debug/flight-test-integration-client -host localhost -port=33569 -scenario auth:basic_proto With output: -------------- -- Arrow Fatal Error -- Invalid: Expected UNAUTHENTICATED but got Unavailable ``` # Changes This PR changes the Rust flight scenario harnesses to print the ready message after the server is *actually* ready. Closes#9593 from alamb/alamb/arrow-11717 Authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This doesn't fix the flaky case, just gets us extra debug info in the case that it does.