Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ARROW-11819: [Rust] Add link to the doc - #9594
Closed
alamb wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Thanks for opening a pull request! Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format? See also: |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #9594 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.32% 82.32% =======================================
Files 245 245 Lines 56414 56414 =======================================
Hits 46445 46445 Misses 9969 9969 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This was referenced Feb 27, 2021
alambforce-pushed
the
alamb/test_change
branch
from
February 28, 2021 12:08
b3f0bc2 to
d06a866Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a test PR with a minor fix, that has no JIRA issue, that I am using to validate my new fancy script (#9598). However, I think it is a reasonable change on its own