Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix for issue 34772 to include user provided providers - #35033
Conversation
Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment |
Assigning reviewers: R: @shunping for label python. Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
Bhargavkonidena
commented
May 25, 2025
assign set of reviewers |
Reviewers are already assigned to this PR: @shunping |
Bhargavkonidena
commented
May 30, 2025
@shunping Can you please review this PR. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
shunping
commented
May 30, 2025
Yes. It looks good overall, but to make things consistent, please correct the flag name. Thanks! |
shunping
commented
May 31, 2025
remind me after tests pass |
Ok - I'll remind @shunping after tests pass |
Bhargavkonidena
commented
Jun 2, 2025
@shunping can you please check now? |
* Fix for issue 34772 to include user provided providers * Fix CI checks * Incorporate review comments
Addresses #34772 by adding code changes to consider user provided providers if they are provided via command-line arguments.
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.