Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
server: fetch IP of VMs on L2 networks - #10431
Conversation
weizhouapache
commented
Feb 19, 2025
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 19, 2025
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.19 #10431 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 15.16% 15.17% - Complexity 11329 11331 +2
=========================================
Files 5413 5413 Lines 474782 474811 +29 Branches 57903 57907 +4 =========================================
+ Hits 72010 72032 +22 - Misses 394722 394725 +3 - Partials 8050 8054 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 19, 2025
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12514 |
weizhouapache
commented
Feb 19, 2025
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 19, 2025
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 19, 2025
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12515 |
weizhouapache
commented
Feb 19, 2025
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 19, 2025
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 20, 2025
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12475)
|
Pearl1594
commented
Feb 20, 2025
@weizhouapache can you please check if this PR does the same as what #10376 is doing? |
weizhouapache
commented
Feb 20, 2025
As suggested by @NuxRo , I cherry-picked 10376 into this PR so we can test together. |
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
dc40a33 to
5f1e11fCompareweizhouapache
commented
Mar 3, 2025
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 3, 2025
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 3, 2025
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12635 |
weizhouapache
commented
Mar 3, 2025
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 3, 2025
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 3, 2025
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12638 |
NuxRo
commented
Mar 4, 2025
Looking good so far @weizhouapache ! |
weizhouapache
commented
Mar 4, 2025
thanks for the testing @NuxRo ! |
weizhouapache
commented
Mar 18, 2025
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 18, 2025
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 18, 2025
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12817 |
yadvr
commented
May 9, 2025
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
May 9, 2025
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
May 9, 2025
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13309 |
DaanHoogland
commented
May 9, 2025
(btw merged because @NuxRo stated that he meant he tested it in #10431 (review) , so its his fault) |
Description
This PR fixes an issue with #10376 , and adds the support to get vm IP for VMs on L2 network via qemu-guest-agent
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?