server: check if redundant router is supported when restart network with makeredundant = true

[weizhouapache]

Description

This PR fixes#10491#10574

makeredundant=true should not work when restart network if

• source nat is not supported, or
• redundantrouter is not supported

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 15.16%. Comparing base (6c40a7b) to head (a9da793).
Report is 42 commits behind head on 4.19.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ain/java/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.19 #10612 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 15.16% 15.16% - Complexity 11328 11332 +4 
=========================================
Files 5414 5414 Lines 474811 474816 +5 Branches 57911 57912 +1 =========================================
+ Hits 72017 72027 +10 + Misses 394742 394733 -9 - Partials 8052 8056 +4 

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.28% <ø> (ø)
unittests	15.89% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12873

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12815)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 69373 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10612-t12815-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 126 look OK, 7 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_add_delete_kubernetes_supported_version	Error	1802.01	test_kubernetes_supported_versions.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup	Error	0.00	test_list_ids_parameter.py
ContextSuite context=TestPrivateGwACL>:setup	Error	0.00	test_privategw_acl.py
ContextSuite context=TestProjectSuspendActivate>:setup	Error	1528.85	test_projects.py
test_CRUD_operations_userdata	Error	1521.65	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata	Error	5.76	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_override_policy_allow	Error	5.76	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_override_policy_append	Error	5.84	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_override_policy_deny	Error	5.88	test_register_userdata.py
test_deploy_vm_with_registered_userdata_with_params	Error	5.78	test_register_userdata.py
test_link_and_unlink_userdata_to_template	Error	5.80	test_register_userdata.py
test_user_userdata_crud	Error	6.00	test_register_userdata.py
ContextSuite context=TestResetVmOnReboot>:setup	Error	0.00	test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn	Failure	286.96	test_vpc_vpn.py

[sureshanaparti]

clgtm

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13039

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13228)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 52673 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10612-t13228-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 133 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[DaanHoogland]

@weizhouapache
on a network with an offering with no source nat:

🐱 > restart network id=1b4351d0-1f7c-4cde-a5ed-8fd8ea54f004 makeredundant=true
{
"account": "admin",
"accountid": "ea229261-2b47-11f0-bc4c-1e006900026d",
"cmd": "org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.RestartNetworkCmd",
"completed": "2025-05-08T08:19:52+0000",
"created": "2025-05-08T08:19:52+0000",
"domainid": "a67d0cd0-2b47-11f0-bc4c-1e006900026d",
"domainpath": "ROOT",
"jobid": "71b63e4c-0d24-493a-97a9-ca2d4904ba6b",
"jobinstancetype": "Network",
"jobprocstatus": 0,
"jobresult": {
"errorcode": 530,
"errortext": "Service SourceNat is not supported by the network offering com.cloud.api.query.vo.NetworkOfferingJoinVO$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$4334c8a8@8b"
},
"jobresultcode": 530,
"jobresulttype": "object",
"jobstatus": 2,
"userid": "ea2473ef-2b47-11f0-bc4c-1e006900026d"
}

, so that’s good.

On disabling offerings supporting redundant routers and restarting teh network, however:

🐱 > restart vpc makeredundant=true id=1e91b16e-9c4b-42ec-914b-851c744da064 {
"success": true
}

I tried these scenarios with isolated, vpc and shared networks. All the same results.
cc @sureshanaparti

I think we can merge this, and consider the redundant scenario valid for shared networks.