Consider Instance in Starting state as well for allocation algorithm by sudo87 · Pull Request #11751 · apache/cloudstack

sudo87 · 2025-09-29T10:54:12Z

Description

This PR fixes#11606

With this change, allocation algorithm will take Instance in starting state as well for allocation.

Types of changes

Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
Build/CI
Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

Major
Minor

Bug Severity

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

codecov · 2025-09-29T11:03:13Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.17%. Comparing base (5dfeb79) to head (5a27bd6).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on 4.20.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.20 #11751 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.17% 16.17% -0.01% 
Complexity 13296 13296 ============================================
Files 5656 5656 Lines 498223 498240 +17 Branches 60454 60457 +3 ============================================
Hits 80577 80577 - Misses 408676 408693 +17 
Partials 8970 8970

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	`4.00% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
unittests	`17.02% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

weizhouapache

code lgtm

sudo87 · 2025-09-29T13:22:01Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2025-09-29T13:24:04Z

@sudo87 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

blueorangutan · 2025-09-29T14:59:38Z

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15222

sudo87 · 2025-09-29T15:41:26Z

@blueorangutan test

blueorangutan · 2025-09-29T15:42:04Z

@sudo87 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

shwstppr

code lgtm

blueorangutan · 2025-09-30T09:07:47Z

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14477)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 59326 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11751-t14477-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

sudo87 · 2025-09-30T14:52:45Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2025-09-30T14:54:04Z

@sudo87 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

weizhouapache

code lgtm

blueorangutan · 2025-09-30T16:26:56Z

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15240

weizhouapache · 2025-09-30T16:56:22Z

@blueorangutan test

blueorangutan · 2025-09-30T16:58:04Z

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

blueorangutan · 2025-10-01T02:03:06Z

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14489)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 29406 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11751-t14489-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 108 look OK, 0 have errors, 33 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
all_test_routers	`Skipped`	---	test_routers.py
all_test_safe_shutdown	`Skipped`	---	test_safe_shutdown.py
all_test_scale_vm	`Skipped`	---	test_scale_vm.py
all_test_secondary_storage	`Skipped`	---	test_secondary_storage.py
all_test_service_offerings	`Skipped`	---	test_service_offerings.py
all_test_set_sourcenat	`Skipped`	---	test_set_sourcenat.py
all_test_sharedfs_lifecycle	`Skipped`	---	test_sharedfs_lifecycle.py
all_test_snapshots	`Skipped`	---	test_snapshots.py
all_test_ssvm	`Skipped`	---	test_ssvm.py
all_test_staticroles	`Skipped`	---	test_staticroles.py
all_test_storage_policy	`Skipped`	---	test_storage_policy.py
all_test_templates	`Skipped`	---	test_templates.py
all_test_update_security_group	`Skipped`	---	test_update_security_group.py
all_test_usage_events	`Skipped`	---	test_usage_events.py
all_test_usage	`Skipped`	---	test_usage.py
all_test_vm_autoscaling	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_autoscaling.py
all_test_vm_deployment_planner	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_deployment_planner.py
all_test_vm_life_cycle	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_life_cycle.py
all_test_vm_lifecycle_unmanage_import	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_lifecycle_unmanage_import.py
all_test_vm_schedule	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_schedule.py
all_test_vm_snapshot_kvm	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_snapshot_kvm.py
all_test_vm_snapshots	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_snapshots.py
all_test_vm_strict_host_tags	`Skipped`	---	test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
all_test_vnf_templates	`Skipped`	---	test_vnf_templates.py
all_test_volumes	`Skipped`	---	test_volumes.py
all_test_vpc_ipv6	`Skipped`	---	test_vpc_ipv6.py
all_test_vpc_redundant	`Skipped`	---	test_vpc_redundant.py
all_test_vpc_router_nics	`Skipped`	---	test_vpc_router_nics.py
all_test_vpc_vpn	`Skipped`	---	test_vpc_vpn.py
all_test_webhook_delivery	`Skipped`	---	test_webhook_delivery.py
all_test_webhook_lifecycle	`Skipped`	---	test_webhook_lifecycle.py
all_test_host_maintenance	`Skipped`	---	test_host_maintenance.py
all_test_hostha_kvm	`Skipped`	---	test_hostha_kvm.py

sudo87 · 2025-10-01T04:01:32Z

@blueorangutan test

blueorangutan · 2025-10-01T04:02:04Z

@sudo87 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

weizhouapache · 2025-10-01T06:53:13Z

this PR makes sense to me, however it is difficult to validate
I think we can merge if there is no regression.
what do you think ? @shwstppr @DaanHoogland

sudo87 · 2025-10-01T07:53:59Z

@weizhouapache, agreed. It needs testing with larger env. That said, I did a basic validation (suggested in the issue) by spinning off 4 instances in 2 different envs running 4.20, one with this change and other without. Both were configured with userdispersing vm allocation algo.

for i in {01..4}; do cloudstack deployVirtualMachine serviceofferingid=XXX templateid=YYY zoneid=ZZZ name=test-${i} & done

Results:

With this change: Instances were evenly distributed across 2 hosts (2-2)
w/o: 3 were placed on host1, 1 on host2

weizhouapache · 2025-10-01T09:15:57Z

@weizhouapache, agreed. It needs testing with larger env. That said, I did a basic validation (suggested in the issue) by spinning off 4 instances in 2 different envs running 4.20, one with this change and other without. Both were configured with userdispersing vm allocation algo.
for i in {01..4}; do cloudstack deployVirtualMachine serviceofferingid=XXX templateid=YYY zoneid=ZZZ name=test-${i} & done
Results:
With this change: Instances were evenly distributed across 2 hosts (2-2)
w/o: 3 were placed on host1, 1 on host2

@sudo87
can you deploy more (e.g. 20) instances with smaller memory ?

sudo87 · 2025-10-01T10:19:52Z

@weizhouapache, agreed. It needs testing with larger env. That said, I did a basic validation (suggested in the issue) by spinning off 4 instances in 2 different envs running 4.20, one with this change and other without. Both were configured with userdispersing vm allocation algo.
for i in {01..4}; do cloudstack deployVirtualMachine serviceofferingid=XXX templateid=YYY zoneid=ZZZ name=test-${i} & done
Results:
With this change: Instances were evenly distributed across 2 hosts (2-2)
w/o: 3 were placed on host1, 1 on host2
@sudo87 can you deploy more (e.g. 20) instances with smaller memory ?

End result is same for both envs, each host has 10 instances running. Transition from Initialize -> Starting -> Running is small for a lean image.

weizhouapache · 2025-10-01T10:56:12Z

End result is same for both envs, each host has 10 instances running. Transition from Initialize -> Starting -> Running is small for a lean image.

ok, so it may happen only if starting vms take a bit long time than usual

blueorangutan · 2025-10-01T20:37:32Z

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14491)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 56552 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11751-t14491-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

…gorithm (apache#11751) * Consider Instance in Starting state as well for allocation algorithm * use IN instead of OR statement

Consider Instance in Starting state as well for allocation algorithm
5e9bb1f

sudo87 changed the base branch from main to 4.20September 29, 2025 10:54

weizhouapache approved these changes Sep 29, 2025
View reviewed changes

harikrishna-patnala added this to the 4.20.2 milestone Sep 30, 2025

shwstppr approved these changes Sep 30, 2025
View reviewed changes

weizhouapache reviewed Sep 30, 2025
View reviewed changes

Comment threadengine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/vm/dao/VMInstanceDaoImpl.java Outdated

use IN instead of OR statement
5a27bd6

sudo87 requested a review from weizhouapache September 30, 2025 14:52

weizhouapache approved these changes Sep 30, 2025
View reviewed changes

weizhouapache added the status:ready-for-merge label Oct 1, 2025

weizhouapache merged commit ca7138b into apache:4.20Oct 2, 2025
26 checks passed

weizhouapache mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025
Userdispersing algorithm does not consider VMs in starting state #11606
Closed

DaanHoogland deleted the considerStartingAllocate branch October 3, 2025 06:39

Uh oh!

Conversation

sudo87 commented Sep 29, 2025

Description

Types of changes

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

Bug Severity

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Uh oh!

codecovBot commented Sep 29, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

sudo87 commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

sudo87 commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sudo87 commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

weizhouapache commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

sudo87 commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

weizhouapache commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

sudo87 commented Oct 1, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

weizhouapache commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

sudo87 commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

weizhouapache commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

codecovBot commented Sep 29, 2025•
edited
Loading

sudo87 commented Oct 1, 2025•
edited
Loading